Category Archives: Columnist

XConfessions and Erika Lust

We’re in the midst of some serious Scorpio astrology, marked by the intensification for many people of their erotic energy, the allure of secrets (and perhaps telling them), and a specific type of creative, transformative power that asks us for surrender. And so it seemed fitting to feature today the XConfessions website for your exploration and discussion.

Erika Lust

Erika Lust

XConfessions is one of several projects by Barcelona-based filmmaker Erika Lust. Registered users can submit (anonymously) their hottest secret fantasies or true sexual escapades from real life. Ms. Lust then chooses two of the confessions per month as her inspiration, and creates a 10-minute short film from each.

The film and the original confession get posted together; you can watch a trailer if you’re not registered — although all it takes is an email address to sign up for free, and anonymously, to see two films (and confess, if you feel so moved).

Ms. Lust explains on XConfessions that she was “Tired of the stereotypical porno-glam and porno-cheap imagery flooding the Internet,” and is looking to create “the most sophisticated and innovative crowd-sourced erotic cinema ever seen.”

Born as Erika Hallqvist in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1977, Ms. Lust is an independent filmmaker with a degree in political science with a focus on feminism. She has directed four award-winning erotic films in addition to the XConfessions shorts; her written works include Good Porn: a Woman’s Guide and The Erotic Bible to Europe.

She pledges “to create new waves in adult cinema, to show all of the passion, intimacy, love and lust in sex: where the feminine viewpoint is vital, the aesthetic is a pleasure to all of the senses and those seeking an alternative to porn can find a home.”

Scorpio is, after all, a feminine sign. The transformation of erotic filmmaking seems to be in promising hands.

Trick or Treat

I write this on Halloween, a cold, blustery day in the Midwest that is destined to devolve into a nasty trick on little ghosts and goblins later tonight when the wind chill hits the teens. Not that many go trick-or-treating door to door these days, thanks to the fears of ‘helicopter moms’ and the pagan-paranoia of evangelicals. More often than not, kids are bussed to cooperative malls and outlets that offer ‘safe’ treats and minimize the ‘stranger danger’ of being lured into some unknown house by a less than upright citizen.

Political Blog, News, Information, Astrological Perspective.

By Judith Gayle | Political Waves

To be sure, unless we know our neighborhood well and have the kids on a short leash, there is suspicion that we won’t be able to find a trustworthy, upright citizen in the autumn of 2014, when nothing is as it seems and reality appears little more than a string of bewildering shocks and psychic-disappointments that go bump in the night.

As it always works out, this is also Samhein, a time when the veil thins and the voices of our ancestors become more than just memory, more a welcome whisper. This is one of eight Pagan festivals that mark change in season and sensibility, this one celebrating the autumn harvest and announcing the coming long months farther from the warmth and light of the great sun. My pots of brightly colored vincas and impatiens will not survive tonight’s freeze and, as I write, I find myself looking out at them again and again, red and pink splashes of color against an already graying backdrop, as if to get my fill until spring. Samhein, All Saints Eve, Halloween — all these traditions take us into deep Scorpionic waters today, signaling the beginning of slower, darker days ahead.

Reviewing the political aspects of the week would simply be mind-exploding for me this close to election, and tedious for you, I suspect, so I’ll just skirt the details today with a few comments on democracy’s challenges. However, in the mood of the moment, let me sweeten up all this tricky business with a few treats: fun links to entertaining reads or vids or pics — you’re welcome.

The barrage of pleas for money and the see-saw projections of who will win the Senate are both exasperating and withering. Let me give you an example of exasperating: this is a TV ad for a Missouri incumbent stumping for re-election here in the Pea Patch. Allow me to introduce you to Billy Long, jiggling his double-chins in disdain of all the political advertisement out there and so outraged [his go-to position] that he’s simply going to run on his 56 votes against Obamacare. Yes, Billy: depressingly homegrown and painfully exasperating. And the withering? That there are citizens out there who not only find Billy’s obstruction of progress a fine platform for a lawmaker in the United States of America, but that — thanks to gerrymander and evangelical politicizing — he will no doubt get another term to fritter away taxpayers’ money on small ideas to suit even smaller minds.

Know what else is exasperating? The monumental amounts of money going into this race even as so many vital projects are begging for financial attention. Indeed, we’ve totally lost the ability to assess the worth of this amount of treasure.

Remember the tizzy fit that John McCain had when Obama bailed out on public financing in favor of the record-breaking $750 million he was able to accumulate through internet contributions? At the time, one of the few people who approved his break with McCain-Feingold was conservative Norm Ornstein, one of the authors of that legislation. Said Ornstein:

What I told a bunch of people a few weeks ago, is that while it would be nice if he decided he felt honor bound to stay within the system and take the money, if he did so I might join a group of people who sued him for political malpractice. When you have the ability to raise the kind of money that he could raise and do it without selling your soul to spend all the time between now and the election on fundraisers, your goal is to win an election and not turn your back on the people voting. There will be outraged editorials and McCain will be justifiably pissed. But it was pragmatically the right decision for him to make.

I think the key words in that statement are “selling your soul.” In politics, the thing one has to sell — but mustn’t, to avoid a downward spiral — is influence, which is why monetizing our political process has led to our current disaster. Obama slipped the restrictions and did the pragmatic thing in 2008, but now in 2014, the run for money has mushroomed into unlimited funding made available through ‘social service’ groups that contribute multi-millions to individual campaigns. And there is apparently no end to the amount that ‘interested’ billionaires — to whom the Citizen’s United ruling guarantees a mighty megaphone of political speech based on income — will spend in pursuit of influence. The veritable glut of Koch money (nicely illustrated for us here, by Jon Stewart) seems to be successfully buying democracy this season, which Stewart has dubbed Democalypse 2014.

In North Carolina, for instance, the race between Dem incumbent Kay Hagan and Pub challenger Thom Tillis has drawn the likes of both Clintons and Mitt Romney to stump for their party. This is one of those states that will define the Senate balance, so the money machine gets bigger and bolder every day, spreading the cash. Spending has already exceeded $100 million, according to the Sunlight Foundation, and it’s no surprise that some two-thirds of that funding comes from groups outside North Carolina. This is just ONE state race, kids — think of the excess to be tallied before this mid-term is done on Tuesday!

(Since you’ve gotten this far, here’s your treat: Paris Hilton with Hooves! Here’s a cute little ‘toon made by We The Economy called “The Unbelievably Sweet Alpacas” featuring the voices of Amy Poehler, Maya Rudolph, and Sarah Silverman as pretty ponies, educating us about income inequality.)

To continue, while there’s no news about Diebold machines to fret over this election, let’s not discount that machine reporting is still a problem, part of our ongoing challenge to voter access. Gore quit fighting too early and Kerry didn’t fight at all; things would have been very different if either had kept the faith. Now ask yourself, why is it that it’s never Democrats who are concerned about purging the polls? Why is it that the blue umbrella is always open to newcomers and people excited about democracy, while the red one snaps shut unless you can produce your papers? Remember how excited the Bushy’s got when the Iraqi’s first voted, waving their purple fingers to prove they’d done the deed? Well, just dandy for the Middle East, but it wouldn’t have been so easy to vote here, citizen! Not with a dark complexion and suspect religious beliefs!

Voter suppression, although it’s been going on forever and a day, just seems glaringly obvious as a hedge against the decline of white authoritarianism and privilege. Hard to argue against the truth that the white folks don’t want the brown or black or yellow or red — or blue, for that matter — folks voting. You have to be blind to avoid drawing that conclusion.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote a scathing response to the SCOTUS decision to allow Texas to proceed with its radical voter ID law, warning that this was the kind of suppression — akin to a poll tax, a 21st century version of Jim Crow — that would stop Americans from voting. Early voting reports seem to prove her right, as literally hundreds of thousands of legitimate voters are being purged, and the money and access required to meet ID standards from state to state marginalizes citizens of slim means.

According to SCOTUS blog, “This was the first time in 32 years that the Supremes allowed a law restricting voting rights to be implemented after a federal court ruled it unconstitutional for targeting minorities.” Again — my mantra — if we needed a reason to vote blue, SCOTUS is it. It can’t come as a surprise that the Federalist wing of the Supreme Court wants to turn the clock back not just to the middle of the last century, but if Scalia holds sway, even further. Ginsberg, by the way, proves to be an excellent Halloween costume, even for the very young, as shown here.

No sense blaming anyone else. Politics is a reflection of us; American politics is a mirror held up to our issues of denial, self-deception, egoism and fear. We can’t move ahead into a new era while dragging the old one behind. Best to face it all now, look it in the eye and accept that our egocentrism and selfishness — what Robert Reich calls Empathy Deficit Disorder — can only be overcome by a needed, and evolutionary, growth in compassion.

Here’s something for you from the goody basket: for Campbell fans, here’s a speech that Joseph Campbell made on the roots of Halloween. I find it very ‘folksy,’ very intimate, as though he’s talking to friends. Not only does it speak to the magic of costumes and play on this occasion, as well as throughout our life, but gives a nice glimpse of Campbell, the person. Enjoy.

And here’s a treat, from my house to yours: go here for a dandy bit of nostalgia about the Ghost of Halloween Past which, despite a somewhat jaded view of disinterested moms, made me long for yesterday. When I sent the link to my daughter, I mentioned that I’d been a good deal more engaged than the mother described and seldom served her a TV dinner, unless she’d specifically begged it. ‘Course, I also got my share of the booty when she and her brother finally got home with the chocolate!

And finally, if you ate or drank too much last night and you’re looking for something to get the blood running, here’s an episode of John Oliver from his HBO TV show which illustrates how brilliant he is, worthy of the kudos he’s receiving. He offers you not just an easy understanding of Net Neutrality but an activist op as well. It will be 13 minutes well invested, and funny to boot!

Hope you found something tasty here, whiling away the hours until Tuesday’s results give us a clearer picture of what’s ahead. I wish a belated “BOO!” to those of you who celebrated a hearty — or quiet or spooky or boring — Halloween this year, and a happy Samhain and All Saints Day to the rest.

Continue to listen for the ancestors; they still have a gift to deliver. And although I know you’ll get to the polls on Tuesday — and if we actually have results the day after — do not be dismayed if it looks like we got a trick instead of a treat.

Like most of the things that scare us, “objects in mirror look closer than they appear.” Once we know that and free ourselves from the optical illusions, we’re calmer, saner and able to affirm that we’re always in the right place at the right time. Whatever happens next is not only do-able, but inevitably proves to be exactly what we need for our growth.

Personal History — Mercury, Venus and Mars

Mercury, Venus and Mars are moving so as to potentially help you employ personal history to make some delayed progress. The three planets most often called ‘personal’ are each separately moving into the same aspect (a sextile) with an outer planet often associated with history.

len-wallick-logo

All three of those separate sextiles will be exact for most of you on Saturday.

Early Saturday, at 8:44 am EDT (12:44 UT) Mercury in Libra will open a sextile to Jupiter in Leo for the third time in two months. 

Then (at 7:09 pm EDT/23:09 UT), Venus in Scorpio will achieve a closing sextile to Pluto in Capricorn. Following about half an hour later will be a likewise approaching sextile from Mars in Capricorn to Neptune in Pisces.

Sextile aspects are separations of 60 degrees in the sky and on the zodiac, typically occurring twice in a given cycle between conjunctions.

Conjunctions are two objects merging in the same degree of the same sign to start a new cycle between them.

Sextiles represent both the first (or ‘opening’) major aspect after a conjunction to begin a cycle, and the last (or ‘closing’) major aspect before the next conjunction, to end a cycle.

In addition to being the first and last major points of evaluation in a given cycle between any two objects, sextiles serve (in the words of Robert Hand) “… to sharpen consciousness and heighten awareness, which requires a certain degree of initiative.”

That’s how you come to have a role to play along with Mercury, Venus and Mars on Saturday. Your role begins with taking the initiative to be aware.

You can start with being conscious of how Mercury, Venus and Mars are often referred to as ‘personal planets’. It’s because they go through many cycles of aspect with other objects in a typical human lifetime.

Thus, along with the Sun and Moon, personal planets correlate with the relative frequency of personal cycles in your life most often measured in weeks, months or years.

In contrast, events that are few and far between relative to a human lifetime (or series of lifetimes) are by definition historic. Cycles of historic events implicitly correlate with planetary cycles measured in decades or centuries.

The next step in exercising some degree of initiative is for you to be aware that Mercury takes about a year to go around the zodiac, as (on average) does Venus. Mars takes about two years. Nevertheless, days when Mercury, Venus and Mars are more-or-less simultaneously in sextile aspect to sign-ruling planets of long cycle are few and far between.

Hence, no matter how ordinary or familiar the events of your life on Saturday may seem to be, there will implicitly be some extraordinary overlap or intersection with history, most likely your personal history. If such a possibility is not a reason to take the initiative and sharpen your consciousness, what is?

Mercury’s correlation with mental acuity makes it a good planet with which to sharpen consciousness. Fortunately, the first of the personal planet sextiles on Saturday is from Mercury in Libra to Jupiter in Leo, setting the tone.

Mercury last conjoined with Jupiter in Leo earlier this year on Aug. 2. Since then, because of its retrograde retracing of late Libra, Mercury has had two separating sextiles with Jupiter (on Sept. 10, and Oct. 20) with the third coming Saturday.

Typically there is only one opening sextile event in the more-or-less annual cycle beginning and ending with Mercury-Jupiter conjunctions.

For there to be three such events in two months is more than just another example of the few and far between encroaching to integrate with the frequent. It’s repetition.

Repetition serves (among other things) to get attention. So consider paying attention. Ask yourself what big (Jupiter) thing you started at the beginning of August only to be locked in mental (Mercury) evaluations ever since. Then, contemplate how turning the key to the third separating sextile from Mercury to Jupiter might be in what Venus and Mars are doing on the same day.

Venus and Mars might be the key to unlocking whatever you have been going back and forth with for several months. That’s because Venus is moving into the closing sextile of its annual cycle with Pluto. Likewise, Mars is approaching its final sextile in a two-year cycle with Neptune.

Both aspects will be exact on Saturday, shortly after Mercury repeats its opening sextile to Jupiter for a third time, implying a connection with your personal history of making progress — or not. 

Consider what unfolded after Venus last conjoined with Pluto on Nov. 15, 2013. Even though that conjunction was not repeated, it was followed by a retrograde that kept Venus in Capricorn until March of 2014.

Hence, evaluating now what you did to overcome delay and resume progress early this year could bring some heightened awareness to whatever repetition has been trying to show you more recently.

That’s the implication of Venus in a closing sextile to Pluto on the same day Mercury opens a sextile to Jupiter for the third time in two months without any headway. An implication worth looking into, given how such concurrences between Mercury and Venus sextile aspects to outer planets are few and far between.

Similarly, to have Mars compound the issue of a rare occurrence indicates something of what you might do to avoid delayed progress in the future. That’s because Mars is entering its final evaluation of a cycle that started with a Pisces conjunction to Neptune on Feb. 4, 2013.

Unlike what followed Mercury’s conjunction with Jupiter last August, and unlike what followed Venus’s conjunction with Pluto last November, Mars made rapid progress into an opening sextile and beyond after beginning its cycle with Neptune.

Mars may then very well be providing you with an evaluation of what you did right in early 2013 as part of its closing sextile to Neptune on Saturday.

Given how such an interpretation is consistent with what Mercury and Venus will be doing on the same day, you should think back on that part of your personal history and place some value on what you remember, especially when the alternative is missing the point Mercury has repeatedly been trying to make.

After all, a failure to learn from history frequently results in a destiny to repeat it. So take a cue from Mercury, Venus and Mars to take a hand in shaping your own personal destiny this weekend.

Look back on your personal history. Renew your grasp of what you started in early August, but somehow lost a grip on. Then, recall what Venus taught you about recovering lost momentum early this year.

Finally, remember how you got off on the right foot in early 2013 to sharpen your consciousness of what you want to get going again now. If you can put the astrology to use like that, this may be one of the most productive weekends you have had in a long time.

Offered In Service

Len is available for astrology readings. You can contact him at lenwallick [at] gmail [dot] com.

A Scorpio Sky and Mars-Pluto Brewing: Go Deep

Mercury has been in direct motion for nearly a week (hallelujah!), although it’s still shaking things out at a slow speed; the last of the October eclipses occurred a week ago. Likely you are beginning to get your bearings again after what might have felt like a giant release-valve being let off.

Photo by Amanda Painter

Photo by Amanda Painter

As you do so, are you noticing a pull to feel things more deeply? We have a cluster of planets in Scorpio now: the Sun, Venus, asteroid Pallas and, later in the sign, Saturn. That’s a lot of Scorpio for a culture that tends to orient on mental activity, with so much information and trending so-called news stories and “social networks” at our fingertips.

With so much Scorpio, the draw is to go deeper: deeper into your emotions; deeper into potentially transformative experiences; deeper into your erotic urges and desires; deeper into your understanding of cycles of life and death.

Is it really any wonder that we get Halloween this time of year, with its emphasis on scary stories and images of death, ghouls, witches and so on? The nights are getting longer, and being afraid of the dark is ubiquitous. Yet many people are even more afraid of “going deep” than they are of the darkness night brings.

Then again, perhaps they are versions of the same thing. Both the dark and the depths ask us to surrender our surface-level perceptions, our daylight-based ego consciousness of our place in the world and who we are in it. To go deep or to be in darkness, we must allow ourselves to become vulnerable in some way.

Continue reading

Recognizable Patterns — Mercury Conjunct the Mean Node

Mercury (in direct motion again since Saturday) makes its third Libra conjunction since Sept. 17 with the mean lunar ascending node (North Node) tomorrow. In the context of everything else going on over the last six weeks, Mercury’s third merger in short order with the lunar North Node implies how recognizable new patterns may now be emerging in your life.

len-wallick-logo

Considering all that has probably been going on for you since mid-September, it might be comforting to finally discern some order in the course of events.

Even if things are beginning to make more sense now, it’s also important to remember how a great deal is still probably in the process of forming — starting with Mercury, and proceeding through you.

On Sept. 14, Mercury in direct motion first passed the degree of Libra where its eventual apparent retreat would end. Thus began the first echo (or ‘shadow’) phase before retrograde. A first conjunction with the lunar North Node followed shortly after on Sept. 17.

The Sun was still in Virgo on Sept. 17. Now, the Sun is in Scorpio, but it’s likely that something of the astrology to follow was foreshadowed when Mercury first conjoined the node in Libra. You may, for example, have heard the echo of our current season, initiated when the Sun entered Libra on Sept. 22.

Back on Sept. 17, you might also have sensed something of what Mercury’s subsequent retrograde (Oct. 4 to Oct. 25) would hold. Most likely, however, Mercury’s first conjunction with the lunar North Node correlated with some anticipation of the eclipses that took place this month.

That’s because the most straightforward meaning of the two perpetually opposing lunar nodes for astrologers is ‘where eclipses take place’ when the Sun is near one of them. In addition, the lunar North Node (or ‘ascending node’) in particular corresponds with looking ahead to the future. 

Sure enough, the Libra Sun was very close to the lunar North Node on Oct. 8, close enough for a total lunar eclipse to take place when the Full Moon opposed the Sun from Aries. At the time, Mercury was slowly backing out of early Scorpio. Then, an interesting sort of symmetry followed, a flip if you will.

Early on Oct. 21, retrograde Mercury’s second conjunction with the North Node in Libra essentially took the place that had been held by the Sun during the lunar eclipse.

Then, on Oct. 23, the conjoined Sun and Moon essentially took Mercury’s previous place in Scorpio, but still close enough to the ascending node to precipitate a partial solar eclipse. If you experienced something of a flip-side of mid-September at the time of the Scorpio solar eclipse, it would be little wonder.

So it is that, having probably seen something of both sides of your life now, Mercury’s third conjunction with the lunar North Node tomorrow will potentially afford you a parallax view looking forward. Implicitly integrated in the forward view will almost certainly be some familiar motifs.

Those familiar tableau will in turn be more sharply defined by both familiarity and the depth perspective gained as a fringe benefit of the edgy astrology you have lived with and through for the previous month and a half — astrology that is not quite done.

Mercury is not done retracing its steps. There is more to re-encounter until Mercury’s second echo phase concludes on Nov. 10. Hence, there are new patterns yet to fall into place, or more appropriately, to be put into place.

In an interesting form of symmetry, the extent to which patterns of your life have been altered, or even disrupted, since Sept. 17 is the extent to which you are implicitly being empowered to consciously put new patterns of life in place.

Therefore, envy not those who appear to have been unaffected by the astrology of late. Those who got off easy will not as easily have seen things coming during Mercury’s first echo phase — though if that describes you, it’s still possible to look back and discern useful patterns.

By the same token, those who remained mostly right side up during Mercury’s retrograde and the eclipses will not have seen as much of the flip side. Those who have not felt somehow flipped will also not be as well attuned to what for many will now be increasingly recognizable patterns which can be further developed to effectively design the future. Not that there is anything to fret about if you have remained among the high and dry — these things always work out as appropriate for the individual.

So, if you are still picking yourself up (or remained standing and are wondering what’s next), please consider yourself to have picked up some valuable experience as well — experience you should soon recognize how to use.  

Offered In Service

Len is available for astrology readings. You can contact him at lenwallick [at] gmail [dot] com.

The Weekend Tarot Reading — Sunday, October 26, 2014

By Sarah Taylor

This week the cards are very clear; as clear as the sense of defeat and pain that they relate; and equally clear about the way that is available to you that moves you through both and towards something different.

seven_disks_nine_swords_knight_cups_rohrig_sm

Seven of Disks, Nine of Swords, Knight of Cups from the Röhrig Tarot deck, created by Carl-W. Röhrig. Click on the image for a larger version.

At the centre of the reading lies the Nine of Swords. Also known in this deck as Cruelty, the image of the Nine of Swords is its own effective description: an eye, its makeup belying the bloodshot veins that run through it, and the open wounds on the cheek below it.

Tears have been shed — are still being shed. There is injury: emotional, physical — in other words, the pain is visceral. It isn’t simply a matter of “I feel hurt.” In this case, “I am hurt,” and it is a phrase that can be taken two ways: first, describing a sense of self-injury; second, describing oneself as the embodiment of pain.

The Nine of Swords describes a sense of cruelty to oneself (written on the card) that is then projected onto the surrounding world. It is anguish writ large in how we experience ourselves and then our interactions with others. When we experience the kind of pain described by the Nine of Swords, we become its agent. Remember that Swords are associated with the mind; and so we turn pain into a belief about who we are, and what the world is in response to us. And so we, too, respond to that world with “heart less passions,” “fanaticism,” “passive opposition,” “martyrism [sic],” “vengeance.” It is a (very) vicious cycle.

Why has this happened? This is suggested in the preceding card, the Seven of Disks.

In some way, you have experienced something not working out the way you had planned or hoped. Your efforts appear to have blocked the Sun. You sit, small, beneath. It is a moment of humbling.

But what if there were no accidents? How about looking at the Seven of Disks more closely in this instance? The sky is, for the most part, clear, soft, and dappled with clouds. The Sun hasn’t disappeared; it is only obscured. But a part of you believes that you have somehow caused the Sun to disappear, when in reality you are not that powerful, and what you are seeing is described by the metaphor depicted in the card: just a passing cloud.

Yet you take it so seriously! So seriously that, perhaps, you have forgotten the courage that it took to embark on your endeavour in the first place. What courage that you even tried! The pain has come from identifying yourself with it so fully that it became its own belief system, an act of total self-definition.

But the Knight of Cups offers the antidote to the cycle of cruelty in which you find yourself enmeshed. His presence is a response to it on all levels. Where there are heart less passions, he brings higher emotional levels; where there is fanaticism, he offers devotion to a loved person; where there is passive opposition, he embodies the ability to give; where there is vengeance, he responds with spiritual relations. There is a St. Francis of Assisi aspect to the card that becomes very clear here: when you are revealed in the gaze of the Knight of Cups — when you look upon yourself and your world with different eyes — you become a channel for peace.

Maybe it is in this moment that you realise your project wasn’t the failure you thought it to be after all.

Astrology/Elemental correspondences: Seven of Disks (Saturn in Taurus), Nine of Swords (Mars in Gemini), Knight of Cups (the fiery aspect of water)

If you want to experiment with tarot cards and don’t have any, we provide a free tarot spread generator using the Celtic Wings spread, which is based on the traditional Celtic Cross spread.This article explains how to use the spread.

Spiraling into the Center

By Amanda Moreno

The world feels beautiful today. After weeks of dissonance and what felt like too much time too close to the edges of sanity, the world feels beautiful, relaxed and if not sane then at least holding steady, at least in my little bubble.

Photo by Eric Francis.

Photo by Eric Francis.

I’ve been hit many times recently with the dawning awareness that I don’t know what it means to be a healer, and I don’t know in what capacity I’m prepared to fill that role.

I don’t like using the term ‘healer’, especially as a label for myself. It makes me cringe. But sometimes I have to give in to the constructs of language and the fact of the matter is that ‘healing’ is the best label for whatever the hell it is that comes through in my sessions with people.

At this moment, however, I don’t know whether I want to go through what it seems to take to be a healer. Once again, here I hit my own preconceived notions — maybe the path to healing others can be a comfortable process. But is that authentic?

The fact of the matter is that I do believe you have to go deep to get to the gold. Is that one more example of my attachment to crisis? Is there a way to go deep and not participate in the cycle of descent and dismemberment?

Furthermore, am I obligated to pursue this path? Is it an option? When you hear the call of your soul, what happens if you turn it down? I’ve always been open to the process, and the understanding that although I’ve chosen to accept the journey I cannot right now understand what the finished product will look like. This is the first time, however, that I’ve encountered doubts like the ones I’ve been facing.

I’ve started questioning how much I am influenced by outside factors, or energies. I’ve also been getting very clear about just how sensitive I am.

The other day I was hit with a sudden knowing of just how much was filling my energy field that wasn’t mine. ‘Mine’ in the ‘this life, this will, my own personal experiences’ sense. I’ve been aware of this for years, but this time around, in a state where I had enough going on all by myself without anything else clinging on, it pissed me off. I’ve been struggling enough with what is right in front of me, with following through with all of the choices I’ve made that have increased my stress levels — choices that have seemed completely worthy and doable. But you add in the tendency to serve as a channel for other people’s everything, and it can become too much.

I didn’t want what feels like such an involuntary tendency to be some kind of dumping ground. How do you learn to trust your own instincts when your field is so cluttered with other people’s stuff? With the weight of the collective? I felt this rage welling up inside of me — for the repression of my true self, my true voice, which I couldn’t hear over the roar of other people’s pain and strife. Perhaps it was the rage of the repressed feminine welling up inside.

So I made some decisions last week. I decided I want my field to be my own (although I suppose there’s a larger philosophical/spiritual discussion that could happen there, because isn’t it all connected anyway?). I asked for help and I purged and purified and I made a decision: I’m not available for other people’s stuff for now. Maybe for a while.
I will keep my ability to sense, I will honor my ability to feel, but I am not available for emotional dumping, from clients, from friends, from random people on the street, and from any entities or energy bodies hanging around. My inner mama tiger is determined to protect the vulnerable bits that have been exposed in recent months.

Maybe it’s naive of me. But my energy feels more spacious right now. If I lean into it there’s a sigh of relief and glee mixed with a little confusion. I celebrated this new space by attending a little hippie-style kinky brunch and facing down several of my fears head on. And came out shining and glowing and full of love. I can feel other people’s pain and pleasure, and knowing that I don’t have to take it on as my own creates relief.

Boundaries — as in knowing and honoring what you are available for — are a wonderful thing. It feels like all parts are coming back to the center. And although that process is confusing and painful at times, I feel like I can breathe through it.

I think there is such beauty in being a healer. But there are so many ways to do it. And right now I’m thinking that I do want in, but I don’t want to take on other people’s shit and I need to reevaluate how I do this work. I want to honor my ability to feel, to acknowledge what is and is not mine, but have really strong boundaries. I want to put myself first, and then be a guide or support to others, but not a savior. I’d love to help other people to heal themselves. Self-generated healing.

I’m in touch with the parts of me that often just wish someone else would come in and fix me. I get it. Perhaps the myth of salvation is just as destructive as the myth of apocalyptic descent; the one that dictates that in order to navigate initiation, especially into the ‘healing’ realms, one must descend and be dismembered and face turmoil and hell.

Maybe I’m just throwing up another wall, but I feel like I’m in a process of truly overcoming my fears, and specifically the negative, racing cognitive loops that spring up around them, keeping me awake, distorting my vision and using my energy. I’ve been trying to change these patterns for years, and so much is finally budging; perhaps the resulting massive shifts in identity are also behind my need to just keep it clean and clear.

And if initiation into healing work has to happen, I want to see if it can be without dismemberment. Can we get to work on changing that myth? Does there have to be a fall? What about gentle healing that doesn’t serve as a bypass for the raw emotions we get to feel. These are larger questions for more expansive discussions, perhaps. But very much worth pondering.

Just Too Dang Much!

By Jeanne Treadway

It’s an interesting phemomenon, this “too” stuff. When people say “you’re strong,” it’s a compliment. When they say “you’re too strong,” it’s a criticism.

I’m one of those bad-broke, rode-hard-put-up-wet kinda gals. You know ’em. Fire sparks from their eyes, smoke streams from the nostrils, and they’re just generally a handful. Sometimes gentle, sometimes a cross between a treed bobcat and a lady. Always keep you edgy wondering how to approach ’em. I don’t know if I was born this way, but it seems like it.

“Talisman” by Via at Studo Psycherotica

My opinion is that the world deserves me just the way I am on account of the way it treats me and everything else. I’m kinda like one of the Earth’s walking consciences, always reminding people of what happens when they treat other people mean. I’m sure you know someone like me. I’m strong, opinionated, pretty, lucky, independent, self-assured, smart.

Oh, I ain’t a stunner dripping with money and gently holding the cojones of the world; no way. I’m one of them strong, independent types who’s got everything nobody else really wants. I’m one of those bitches who makes everybody nervous and that everybody calls touchy or crabby. I am too damned much for anyone to handle, or so they say.

The first time I remember having that odd little “too” adjective applied to me was when I was about five and was told I was too young to understand, too small to do it, and too hard to get along with. In the first case, a five year old should never be sacrificed to nuns for education. Secondly, I could ride any horse I got on, sort of. And finally, if they would talk to me reasonably I might not be so damn hard to get along with. But all this was just a portent, a hint, of what was coming.

By the time I was eight, I was too smart, too dumb, too much a tom-boy, too serious. I kept the smart, dumb, serious part and became known as Little Miss Priss to my family by age ten. Puberty found me weighing in at 85 pounds, heft that was stretched across a five six frame, with a mouth full of teeth that wouldn’t fit until I was about twenty, braces, and the self-esteem of a mouse. No tits, no hips, just elbows and knees and braces. Gorgeous from any perspective. My mom always told me I had a great smile, though. Very small comfort to a human tree.

Kids were mean and stupid and I found solace with very old people; they had something to say and knew how to listen. The first love affair I ever had was with my grandmother who died when I was nine. I played dominoes and jacks and could skip high waters/hot peppers with the best, but I also read forty to sixty books a semester from second grade on. I loved Hank Williams and Patsy Kline when Elvis was king. Vincent Price, who was better than John Wayne every hoped to be in my book, introduced me to Poe. Our twit of a librarian refused to allow me to check out the collected works of that dear alcoholic because I was only in fourth grade, but she poured the first shot in a life-long addiction.

I knew rocks, snakes, trees, water, rabbits, cats, and horses had souls; I was uncertain about people. I wanted to be a ballerina from age six until I dropped that nonsensical dream on my twenty-eighth birthday when I did an arabesque and semi-permanently sprained my ankle.

I fit well in high school, too. I had to take the high school entrance exam twice because I scored higher than the male genius and the first score was obviously a fluke. By fourteen I had fallen in love with a man who was to fill my dreams to the present, some thirty years later. We were an item during my twenties, but that story best fits in later. I dated three guys in high school, none of them him, and scandalized the town with my supposed promiscuity (you were only allowed one man every four years back then). I wasn’t selected to cheer for the team because, as the kind president of the pep squad told me, they were afraid I might become too egotistical. My algebra teacher made certain I was never elected to senior honor society or chosen as an honor student because I was too loud in the halls. I was asked to run as secretary of the senior class, but wanted to run as president. Girls names were never entered for that position so I didn’t get to run for anything.

I kept thinking I was going through a phase, that some time in the near future I would be just good enough. In fact, it wasn’t a phase and it expanded to include too sensitive, too loving, too good, too bad, too intense, too modern, too wild. Let’s see, what did I miss? Oh yeah, too sad, too happy, too mad, too glad. Too much a hippy, too old-fashioned. Don’t get confused here, these were certainly not words I applied to myself. Good-intentioned professors, friends, therapists, bosses, unknowns told me these things, for my own good, of course.

What the hell is a twenty-year-old supposed to do with this kind of knowledge? I thought love might help me figure it out. Believe me, it doesn’t. It just adds to the list. Drugs don’t help either. They mirror the words back onto your soul and write them into your heart with a bitter, indelible ink. Alcohol is a socially acceptable method of drowning, but that leads to alcoholism and, dang, that’s a tough one to get rid of. Thank God for the rare soul who believes in you, without strings, without wanting to own or change or manipulate.

I’m not certain when I started thinking I might be okay to look at, that my nose wasn’t too big or my cheekbones too prominent or my lips too big. Somewhere in my mid-thirties I decided my eyes were really quite nice, but pretty? Never. In fact, I settled for exotic. That’s better, anyway, isn’t it? I think getting sober at 32 unlocked the gate for several revelations, including that I was bright, could be charming and okay to look at, and might have something of value to give to friends and lovers. It’s a theory I’m still testing, twenty years later, though.

Briefly back to the love of my life. He just got married for the second time, obviously not to me, and that’s because, he says, he would rather be comfortable than passionate. Ergo I am too passionate. He’s probably right that our marriage would have been tough, but damn him anyway.

What the hell is wrong with being too passionate, too sensitive, too everything? Why is this silly little adjective thrown at me in explanation for each aspect of me? My beloved sister once told me I was too supportive. Jeezo peezo! Was I supposed to become less smart, less pretty, less lucky, less sensitive, less passionate? Would that ensure that someone would love me? That I would find a place I fit in this world? That the pain would abate? What was I supposed to do with this stuff? How do people want me to react, to change? I was simply befuddled by this. It ebbed and flowed. I could go a whole three, maybe four, months without someone using that adjective to describe something I had just done, some feeling I had just expressed, some thought I had just expounded. But without fail, that well-intentioned look would descend on someone’s face and the next “too” would pop out.

It’s an interesting phenomena, this “too” stuff. When people say “you’re strong”, it’s a compliment. When they say “you’re too strong”, it’s a criticism. It implies that you are supposed to do something about it, that somehow you have stepped over an appropriate, social boundary and that, if you were a “good” person, you would do something to correct that faux pas. When you first encounter it, it stings but you don’t spend much time thinking about it. You have no idea that little word will become your personal Chinese water torture, wearing your heart away drop by drop. You start hearing that word in every conceivable context. Is there something wrong with you? Do you have some major deficit? Were you born missing some key ingredient that would allow you to understand this too stuff? The weight of that silly little word is extraordinary because not only is it used to put you in your place, it is also invariably used to explain why someone treated you abominably and why you should be big enough or strong enough or gracious enough to let that rudeness pass. In essence, because you are “too” you have to accept every form of abominable behavior imaginable. People are allowed to and, according to their moral precepts, should bring your “too” behavior to your attention, just in the off chance you were unaware that you’re a “too” person.

I spent years shaving off parts of my personality. You know, trying to speak softer, act nicer, be stupid. I even wore suits and coiffed hair. Jeez. I figured if I kept shaving I’d eventually get to the “good enough” part and then everyone would start saying I was just strong enough or smart enough or whatever. It doesn’t work that way, but dang it takes some learning to figure it out.

Finally, though, it comes to you. They ain’t never gonna be satisfied. They just need to break your spirit for some reason. When you get to that understanding, and believe me it don’t come quick, you have yourself a year-long cry, dust off your boots, and start living for yourself again. Now, just like I love those delicious little power surges they call hot flashes, I glory in being too much. It reminds me I am vitally alive, full of piss and vinegar, raring to go. It lets me know that they haven’t broken me to saddle yet. Oh sure, they still want to but, until they figure out that wounding an animal’s pride only makes it mean, they’ll never get this mare in their corral.