Author Archives: Fe Bongolan

About Fe Bongolan

Planet Waves writer Fe Bongolan lives in Oakland, California. Her column, "Fe-911," has been featured on Planet Waves since 2008. As an actor and dramaturge, Fe is a core member of Cultural Odyssey's "The Medea Project -- Theater for Incarcerated Women," producing work that empowers the voices of all women in trouble, from ex-offenders, women with HIV-AIDS, to young girls and women at risk. A Planet Waves fan from almost the beginning of Eric's astrology career, Fe is a public sector employee who describes herself as a "mystical public servant." When it comes to art, culture and politics, she loves reading between the lines.

Home

I’ve been home with my family for 24 hours and because of the cold, wet, wintry days, we’ve been either cooking, eating, punching the keyboard or wrestling with the dog. My niece’s dog Taz — a German Shepard-Labrador mix — is less than a year old and looks as though she’s big enough to eat my sister.

Because she is a puppy, she still thinks when she jumps up on you that you’d be happy enough to let her leap into your arms. But at 75 pounds and growing, we’re a bit past that point.

Our days together are peppered with intermittent screams of “Taz, don’t eat my shoes!” Or “Taz why do you have to be under all our feet while we’re trying to cook?” Or that desperate, searching, panicked question, “Taz, what is that in your mouth?”

If you haven’t guessed by now, the family gathering at my sister’s house for the holidays is a warm mash of love and chaos. And we like it that way. We’re in celebratory mode. Both my sister’s kids are newly employed in the ‘real world’ while our generation — their mom, pop and me — beam proudly, with a big sigh of relief to the side. My niece’s young man is celebrating his birthday with us, a Solstice Eve natal return. His fourth one in a row here.

We’re a family that’s growing and expanding, and this week we’re experiencing our gathering once more at the solstice fire. A busy eventful year has come to an end.

Witnessing my niece and nephew grow into adulthood, I still hold on to mementos from phases of our family’s history. I have a picture I took with my niece when she was just three years old in a photo booth at the Santa Cruz boardwalk. In my bathroom, I keep a hand-built ceramic vase my nephew made in his middle school art class. It’s been broken in a few places over the years and I have re-assembled it each time, repairing it kintsugi style: using epoxy and gold mica powder to fill the cracks, the repair of the vase making it more beautiful than it was before. Perfect in its imperfection.

Approaching the year’s end, you can’t do anything but think about time. How far we’ve come. What has been. Time, for me especially, continues to be observed and measured in children — actual and creative. These days as a dramaturg I’ve been either writing, editing, or looking at everything from scripts to videos that cover twenty years of my working in the Medea Project.

Yesterday, I caught a glimpse of myself on stage in a video shot twenty years ago. As I looked at that me on the tape, and then looked up at a mirror close by, I had a clear opportunity to see on my face where time did its work. Because I have allowed the creative to be expressed all my life, I was happy to see that time’s work was gentle. I felt appreciation, not regret, for the life and the choices I have made. And for that, I am grateful I never had any kids. Not physical ones. All my creations were my children, and I’ve been pregnant for a long time.

For me, the measurement of time — because I now have a body of work to look back upon — has begun to include the trueness of the art. Do my creations still have relevance or were they satisfactory just for the moment? What does my work say to me now? Does it still even need to say anything? Does it still make sense?

Then I realize I’m not just measuring time in duration but in meaning. I realize there is a pattern forming in my work and in my life that’s moving outward and growing. A seed planted long ago has become the tree, branching upward.

Vision-Quest_button

I’m putting away the past, reminding myself to stay in the present. I am a work in progress, a self-exploring, often doubtful, volatile-minded woman who is still trying to open more doors inside, to see what mysteries await there.

How much love is there to have? How many notes are there to sing? Does everything have to be meaningful? Can’t life just be? And then you realize there are still more questions, bigger questions that you need to ask — and to answer for yourself.

Throughout my life I’ve always wondered how I would reconcile my love of and attachment to family with my aspirations outward. But my chart drew it out for me long ago like a map. My 5th house South Node, Jupiter and Uranus in family-loving Cancer was reaching across the wheel to my 10th house Venus in Sagittarius and 11th house North Node in Capricorn.

My familia. We’ve held ourselves together by tradition, love, down-to-earthness, fun and nourishment. Some days I feel like running away from them. Others, I miss them so that I need them like a flower needing rain. I come home now to recharge the batteries as well as to stay in touch. I then go back to the city and to my life, ready to take the reins back and drive. I don’t forget that because my family is such a grounding force, I can fly.

It’s not always going to be like this. The kids will one day have their own kids and we will all be older. But today, reflecting on the past year this Solstice, a little love and chaos on the longest night on our half of the Earth isn’t at all bad, even with a dog with a history of questionable somethings in her mouth. It’s all family. And whether it’s your blood family, adopted family or preferred family, wherever you feel most comfortable being you in all your various facets, flaws and feelings, that is perfect even in its imperfection. It’s what I define as home.

See you in the comments.

The Beast from 30,000 feet

Last week, DuPont and Dow Chemical announced their plan to merge their two companies into one: DowDuPont. The merger will produce three separate branch companies with focus on agricultural products such as herbicides and genetically modified seeds, commodity chemicals including plastics, and specialty chemicals such as those used in solar panels.

This is the fifth merger of major American corporations this year: Pfizer-Allergan for $160 billion; Anheuser-Busch-SAB Miller for $180 billion; Royal Dutch Shell-BG Group for $88; Charter Communications-Time Warner for $80 billion; and now Dow Chemical-DuPont for $68 billion.

I am not one inclined to writing on a subject from 30,000 feet — the normal cruising altitude for domestic airlines — which is exactly the vantage point most people in board rooms who make decisions such as these mergers view the rest of us on the ground. I am most interested in us — the ants on the ground.

I am not inclined to writing science fiction. Science fact is pretty dramatic and dangerous in and of its own. But figuring on this merger, which is standard practice in the world of corporate mergers and acquisitions — with the history of both the players — leaves me with a great sense of unease for the rest of us here below.

Silly me, what could possibly go wrong with the merger of two mega chemical giants, both with corporate histories of causing cancer, toxic chemical disasters, and depletion of what was once an abundantly diverse biosphere?

In large part, the creation of DowDuPont was done as a mechanism to withstand international competition from China, India — and their chief domestic rival Monsanto; and to respond to increasing pressure from ‘activist’ investors whose motivation is, of course, an increased bottom line. Their individual profit lines were not enough. To do anything less than this would be declaring corporate surrender. Their shareholders still want more.

Given recent history we know what that means, especially for big players like Dow and DuPont. In the short term: job cutting and factory shutdowns, followed by an increased pressure on existing plants to diversify and increase production.

This is the traditional setup for the big demon of corporate malfeasance to be let loose, if they do not carefully monitor and manage the production transition: failure to manage plant operational safety, which leads to plant accidents or other environmental disasters. Add on to that the plain fact that these plants anywhere on the Earth is a health risk to those of us here on earth, especially nearby.

Vision-Quest_button

You can be certain that resentment against environmental regulation here in the US will push production elsewhere on the planet, creating more profit at an environmental expense abroad. How will they manage and monitor plant safety in international venues? These are mild concerns compared to what could happen. All it takes is one terrible incident to blow the cover off. And that doesn’t exclude terrorism.

It’s suspicious these corporate changes are happening on a parallel track with the COP21 climate agreement, which by the way will not have enough teeth to crack down on the mass globalization of corporate polluters. Poorer countries will still feel the brunt of this, and the poor everywhere, including here in the US, will feel this as well — as both an economic and environmental burden.

As with any merger of such major international corporate players, a round of international vetting will need to take place over the next year. The US Federal Trade Commission will check to make sure that the merger will not impede fair competition, which is as far as the US will go. We should be watching to see how big a corporate payoff it will take to get approval from other industrial states across the planet to play ball with the new monster DowDuPont.

Do I sound naive? Anti-capitalist? Anti big business? Alarmist? Am I not being fair to DowDuPont? In a word or two, hell yes. From Exxon to Fukushima, the track record for large corporations has not been good. Anything can happen, and it has — at an unimaginable scale on an already fragile world. And those of us who have watched these events unfold have no delusions that a merger between two corporate chemical giants will lead to more transparency and accountability. Snowball’s chance.

When corporations such as these commit these environmental disasters — which cause emphysema, cancer and birth defects (and that’s just if we consider the impact on humans), and which their respective boardrooms would robotically categorize as “regrettable, unanticipated and unfortunate loss,” that is about as humane a statement that an entity from 30,000 feet can be. These statements, the cover for criminal acts against the rest of us, are crafted specially for them by a team of lawyers from the 70th floor of a legal conglomerate somewhere in a major international corporate hub.

You get the message. It’s not personal Guido. It’s just business.

Our Convenient Amnesia

Its been a difficult few weeks in America since the Paris attacks of mid-November. With the responsibility for the attacks claimed by ISIS, all the usual suspects latent in America’s post-911 xenophobic subconscious have emerged like ugly flowers.

Now, given the sunlight of the San Bernardino shooting — where a young couple purportedly claimed their support for the ISIS cause (though ISIS claims no responsibility) and killed 14 people in a public services office — these flowers are in full bloom.

Of course the nightly news isn’t helping. Once again, we revisit late 2001, reborn in Donald Trump’s and Ted Cruz’s demagoguery. And their supporters love it. No need for facts right now. Just plain, raw emotion, suspicion, xenophobia and a desire for vengeance. All the national uncertainty surrounding why this young immigrant couple with a six-month old baby took to opening fire on civilians in a government building is essentially a powder keg — one we’re sitting on squarely.

Because of that public uncertainty, the once-diminishing Trump campaign gained new life in the wake of the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino. Once again grabbing hold of the national id, Mr. Trump’s declarations of going after not only terrorists but their families on national news has helped him regain further traction, building into a sizable lead over his fellow challengers for the nomination.

I don’t even recall George W. Bush being so blatantly anti-immigrant in the aftermath of 9-11. Yet, with Trump’s entire party in fear of a Black president, and never one to let a moment for opportunism slip, Donald — the alpha demagogue, Mr. Branding himself — dove to even lower lows. He was followed by Ted Cruz, the beta demagogue, who gave his anti-Muslim xenophobia its own flair. Not surprisingly, recent polls among Republican voters place Trump and Cruz as first and second, respectively, and Ben Carson’s once appallingly pleasing campaign has faded.

It is under these circumstances that President Obama spoke to the nation in an unusual Sunday evening address, asking for calm, attempting to reassure a highly wary and trigger-happy America that the government plans to get to the bottom of the San Bernardino attacks, and asking us to remember what we are as a nation. Even though all the right words seem to have been written and said, the general atmosphere on both sides of the political sphere is division and mistrust. Will he or won’t he pull the trigger and send boots on the ground in Syria? Will he go to war to keep us safe?

It is here where, among other words spoken by the President, I ask today for calm as he did. Yet I want to take that one step further and ask not for calm as in complacency, but for the reasoned calm of one insistent on investigating who did what to whom and why in San Bernardino. Getting to the bottom of it. All of it. I mean, not doing this lead to the Iraq Invasion in 2003 which started all of this in the first place.

Here is where we find that gap in the memory tape, our convenient amnesia that eclipses what should be the lessons of history whenever we’re frightened and insecure. We’re scared for the continuance of our privileged way of life, our dominance, and our sense of superiority and exceptionalism in the world. That is a lot of baggage to unload.

Are you the political black sheep in your family? Welcome to the most sane forum for discussing politics on the Internet. You can now get access to articles posted on this website through Planet Waves' new reader-level membership? So if you have friends who've reached their click-limit, pass it along. Our Core Community membership still gets you email delivery, plus other perks.

Are you the political black sheep in your family? Welcome to the most sane forum for discussing politics on the Internet. You can now get access to articles posted on this website through Planet Waves’ new reader-level membership? So if you have friends who’ve reached their click-limit, pass it along. Our Core Community membership still gets you email delivery, plus other perks.

But, this is unfinished business looking us in the face, and we’re grasping for answers that we already know exist but are afraid to admit. This is where our failure to remember always gets us in trouble.

Fifteen years after 9-11, if we haven’t been paying attention, is plenty of time for cells and insurgencies to be reborn, die off, reconstitute and carry on. We’ve known that. That is why we’ve had the acronym GWOT (Global War on Terror) tattooed on our psyches. The issues created by a country we destroyed, namely Iraq, remain — from Al-Qaida to the Islamic State and whoever comes next.

Because we are in a race for a White House that climate change deniers and neocons are spending billions to claim (and who stand to gain from the chaos of war in the Middle East), the general atmosphere in the country is volatile. And the current political dialogue is a lit match. Are we forgetting that, with all the scapegoating and demonization of immigrants from wars we caused, we are still sitting in that room loaded full with powder kegs and playing with fire?

With this in mind, I’m posting this reminder from On The Media.org for our readers, which I found through Daily Kos over a week ago:

BREAKING NEWS CONSUMER’S HANDBOOK — Terrorism Edition

1. Remember, in the immediate aftermath almost everyone will get it wrong.
2. As always, local, non-anonymous, and verified sources offer better info.
3. Amid all the contradictory statements,focus on consistent reports.
4. The more emotional the commentary, the less reliable the information.
5. Really don’t pay attention to politicians.
6. In fact, examine the credentials of all putative “experts.”
7. Pay attention to the language the media uses:
“Mastermind” — endows terrorists with more power than they have
“Sophisticated” — overestimates crudely planned mayhem.
“Unprecedented” — there is little “new” in terrorist methods.
8. Inevitably, whole populations and religions are scapegoated. Ignore this.
9. Resist reflexive retweeting. Number of shares belies accuracy.
10. Be patient.

This list is relevant today and will be in the tomorrows to come. Please cut it out and paste it by your keyboard, television or on your refrigerator for reference. Just in case we forget.

The Elephants are Dancing

More than 100 leaders are meeting right now to haggle over the details of a response to global warming that will not stem what is already happening: rising ocean temperatures are melting polar ice caps, increasing sea levels and changing global weather patterns.

This temperature rise is the cause of drought, famine, deadly storms, the drowning of small island nations and, in the case of Syria, may be the root cause of a deadly civil war initiated by internal struggles over water usage due to a savage drought. This war has ultimately led to a mass migration of 4.3 million Syrian refugees to countries in Europe, Asia and the Americas, creating immense economic and social pressure on all nations involved.

Yet, because of global warming, there will be more migrations to come. This is not an “if” or a “maybe” but a “when.”

We know current global economic interests cling to an energy infrastructure that world economic powers are loathe to dismantle. There is the elephant in the room: the achingly slow-moving train of the largest polluters — the US and China — to do something, anything, significant to change significantly or at least modify our energy consumption and production.

Any meaningful change is too far away on the horizon to stop what is happening to us right now on the ground. Not with a Congress in the pockets of oil and coal money, and a Supreme Court that made political money from corporations a form of free speech protected by the Constitution.

If this all seems to indicate the planet is in trouble, it is. And yet, people on the ground are rising up. Sunday, the day the Saturn-Neptune square was exact, more than half a million people worldwide participated in demonstrations in advance of the COP 21 Paris Climate Summit. The BBC reports that over 200 climate change protesters were arrested in Paris yesterday. Simultaneous protests occurred yesterday as well in Brazil, Colombia, Australia, the US, the UK, Chile, Kenya, the Marshall Islands and Australia. It was a global alarm clock waking us from our political slumber.

Given the results of the Copenhagen Climate Summit in 2009, I am far from hopeful that the COP 21 will be successful in stemming the political and actual tide in 2015. But perhaps the urgency of the matter is even more in the face of these global leaders, who are attending the talks in Paris just two weeks after an alleged IS attack on the city itself — and with the ongoing global humanitarian crisis facing millions of Syrian refugees still humming loudly in world news.

A global commitment to making change, even a half-hearted one, may be better than none at all. It’s just that the price seems to be going up with each passing day as we delay and compromise. Will we see real commitment for tangible results? There are many challenges and opportunities that face these leaders, specifically from the US, UK, China and Japan — the world’s biggest consumers and polluters. Will they see the big picture at all?

Don't let the word "change" scare you; Planet Waves just helps you find your flow. Dive in with a Reader Level membership (tell your friends about it!), or a Core Community membership.

Don’t let the word “change” scare you; Planet Waves just helps you find your flow. Dive in with a Reader Level membership (tell your friends about it!), or a Core Community membership.

In the title of her book When the Elephants Dance, Tess Uriza Holthe describes the struggle of Filipinos to survive while the US and Japan fought World War II in the Philippines. The big powers — the elephants — fight while the rest of us — the chickens underfoot — run so as to not be crushed.

It’s the same today. The big polluters are the elephants who are dancing while we chickens on the ground tremble in their wake, hoping, praying, protesting and fighting against the wheel that could crush us all.

But it will take that to prevent what seems to be the inevitable from happening; a mighty push from the ground below, as well as a change in the consciousness of those in the grand meeting rooms of the Paris summit. It already has happened and we must all act to prevent it from getting worse.

All our eyes are watching Paris this week and our arms are raised, ready. Even us chickens on the ground can get enough wing speed to rise up and fly. The time to do it was yesterday, but right now will do too.

The Easy Lie

“Nothing spoils tomorrow more surely than fear of it.” — Len Wallick

Never were more truer words said than what our colleague Len Wallick wrote in his Friday column. From the Mayor of Roanoke, Virginia to the 47 Congressional Democrats who broke against the president and voted with Republicans to place a moratorium on accepting a modest number of Syrian refugees — 10,000 women and children — we have become prey to the easy lie, denying a safer and more hopeful tomorrow for people escaping the terror of war.

It’s easy enough to get people who are only given a certain set of facts to believe a lie. Check out Donald Trump’s tweet: “Eight Syrians were just caught on the southern border trying to get into the U.S. ISIS maybe? I told you so. WE NEED A BIG & BEAUTIFUL WALL!”

What his 130-character summation does not tell you is that members of two Syrian families presented themselves to authorities at the Department of Homeland Security at the Southern Border. The women and children were taken to a family residential center while the men were transferred to a detention center, DHS said.

But because of our terror of ISIS, Syrians, Muslims, and the ghost of 9-11, our minds cannot absorb facts, and so when a lie is repeated, again and again, in various forms and variations, the surface gloss of an innuendo-loaded statement becomes solid evidence. See how easy and dangerous that is?

But we’re not only failing these war refugees. By the very truths that we hold dear, by the very foundation upon which this country was built, we’re failing ourselves. As best said in an editorial in The Cincinnati Enquirer:

The selective nature of the proposed moratorium — targeting refugees from only one country — is also troubling because there’s no confirmed, direct link between Syrian refugees and the Paris attacks. All the suspects identified so far hailed from France or Belgium. The call to block Syrian refugees is being made despite the evidence, not because of it. […]

Our refugee resettlement program — yes, even for Syrians — represents a core American value, one that reflects and continues our identity as a melting pot. We are a country founded and fueled by immigrants. We are a nation powered by the proposition that we value oppressed people — of all colors and creeds — who seek shelter.

I began last weekend heartsick with the familiar ring of politics ginning up people’s fears. When will we ever learn? It wasn’t helpful that the Republican presidential candidates used the refugee moratorium to rev up even more xenophobia on the stump, winning the news cycle in tandem with their Congressional compatriots. All we need right now is another fear-based political campaign to hoist a demagogue into the White House.

I have been tired of this since 2003, as are most of the people in my community in the San Francisco Bay Area. Yes I know we’re not middle America, and by all measures the view of us — correct or not — is that we are crypto-liberal extremists too willing to sell the country out to the Communists. Whatever. But throwing my shoe at a CNN news reporter on television was not going to help. Neither was yelling at the car radio on my commute home. My anger was nourished by the fear.

I tried to put my mind’s focus on other things this weekend: going to a play on Friday; and on Saturday, catering for the artists at the International Body Music mini-fest at Berkeley’s traditional music institution, Freight and Salvage.

There were forty artists, all “hyphen-Americans” representing various cultures — African-American, Mexican-American, Eastern European-American, and East Indian-American — representatives of the society that we have become. Pieces of our American multi-ethnic fabric. It was an evening of percussive, jazz, dance and traditional music all done without instruments.

illuminate your heart, feed your soul, help love conquer fear: sign up for Planet Waves' Reader Level membership (tell your friends!) for web access to all articles; or get email delivery plus Eric's SMS astrology service and more with a Core Community membership.

illuminate your heart, feed your soul, help love conquer fear: sign up for Planet Waves’ Reader Level membership (tell your friends!) for web access to all articles; or get email delivery plus Eric’s SMS astrology service and more with a Core Community membership.

After our pre-show meal everyone circled up to be together before curtain. The house was packed. As the Festival’s co-director Evie Ladin said: “The world is in a shit storm right now, and the people out there need us to lift them up.”

People were looking for the same kind of relief I was from the last week’s xenophobia and each and every one of the artists stepped up. No one held anything back.

The finale was a gathering of all artists from their various ethnic traditions leading the audience out of the auditorium into the lobby for a wide open celebration of clapping, stomping and chanting for the audience and the artists. There was nothing but smiles in that lobby. The show was medicine.

Looking back now, this show was a living snapshot of what our core American values are and what the Cincinnati Examiner editorial referred to: inclusion and appreciation of the differences and similarities of our human experience on this planet. We’re all in one country that is a part of this one world.

I told my best friend Rhodessa about the show. As of right now she is flying east for Thanksgiving to visit her family in Georgia. Before she left to get on the plane, she said to me the same thing Evie said: “The world is in an uproar. Time now to give our friends, family and community our best and with love.”

We have so much to be thankful for: we’re safe, definitely food-secure, and we have a community of friends and family to help us shoulder our burdens and re-assure us with love and support. For us, the only war going on right now is for our minds and hearts to believe in a fear that could not only spoil, but end tomorrow. Even with that we can choose not to play.

When we open our mouths to pray in thanks this week, let’s work to open minds and hearts as well — ours and others. Love, fear and lies don’t mix. Love cannot exist with lies and fear cannot exist with love. Love conquers them both. Easily.

Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

The One You Feed

Sunday morning, Nov. 15. I’m writing 48 hours after the first explosions were heard at the Stade de France where France was playing Germany in a soccer match. In restaurants, a bar, and the Bataclan concert hall in the 11th Arrondisement of Paris people were attacked and killed by three ISIS teams using kalashnikov rifles and suicide vests.

The assailants all spoke perfect French.

As I write this, CNN’s “Paris-Terror Attacks” coverage drones unendingly on the television. Paris is stunned, in a state of shock. Authorities fear the crisis is not over. The word “fear” is liberally dispersed throughout the coverage, amplifying the general atmosphere in France and abroad as a low-lying hum of horror. At least to the viewers here and elsewhere CNN provides coverage.

I am certain the people of France and Belgium — where some members of ISIS terror cells allegedly are based — are apprehensive. I am certain major cities of Western Europe are on high alert. At this moment, the investigation is uncovering an even wider range of suspected ISIS activities beyond France. There are questions about security risk of the Syrian refugees entering Europe, as they try to escape from the devastation wrought by their country’s civil war.

It all breathes, feels and tastes like Sept. 11, 2001. If we haven’t had enough of the march towards war, the news media makes sure we work ourselves up into an appetite for more with hints of it. Fear is as much a social and political nutrient as rainwater is to weeds, providing as much fuel for our current political discussions as Donald Trump’s bluster, Ben Carson’s inanity and Hillary Clinton’s emails.

I am certain of one thing: There are enough of us who are plenty fed up with the bullshit orchestrated these days in the era of asymmetrical warfare. We have proof that the alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq were a lie. A lie used to begin a pointless, expensive and stupid war. That was attested to by George W. Bush himself, admitting as much in his memoir Decision Points.

What makes ISIS any different from Al Qaeda? Same game, different players. We know that ISIS was a direct result of the instability of our installed regime in Iraq and our support for the anti-Assad rebellion in Syria. Countries in the midst of civil war are fertile ground for insurgents of all stripes. Al-Qaeda, once America’s bete noir, has been taken backstage as ISIS rises to play the lead of terrorist du jour. Our initial impulse is to stamp them all out by the cudgels of war, but you can’t kill a movement with a cudgel. Not when young, disaffected and disempowered men and women are attracted to the seductive online recruitment provided by ISIS.

Yet France’s President Francoise Hollande uses the words “act of war,” similar to what Mr. Bush said after the twin towers fell — raising the apprehension of possible NATO involvement, or further incursions on the ground in Syria. France had launched airstikes in Syria earlier in September.

Again and again, it all feels so hauntingly familiar. Are we on the highway to making another stupid mistake? Or are we hovering nearby, cruising at less than highway speed from a frontage road following the events and their aftermath in Paris?

I am waiting for news that the investigation by French and other international agencies will focus first on the cause before an easy, immediate and impulsive answer is implemented. I hope for measured response and reasoned examination. A brink of some kind was reached — you can see it in the chart of the event, at the bottom of this post (you can also view a simpler chart on Eric’s Facebook page). And we have a choice to blindly accept what is being fed us or to question our choices beginning now.

While we’re at it, perhaps we should remember that while Paris was attacked, so was Beirut — a vibrant city that still struggles to find stability, but knows no end of violence. Are they consigned to our neglect while the jewels of the Western world burn?

I am certain of this: the people of France want and deserve answers, as does the world. I know this seems simplistic and naive, but while investigating ISIS as a credible and dangerous threat, perhaps we should re-evaluate what has been wrought through our economic and military adventures and their impact on the rest of the world this last decade.

Planet Waves brings you reason and heart, intellect and soul when it matters most. If you or a friend has reached your click-limit on PW articles, try a new Reader Level membership. To ensure we can keep bringing you thoughtful astrological commentary on world events, please join with a Core Community membership.

Planet Waves brings you reason and heart, intellect and soul when it matters most. If you or a friend has reached your click-limit on PW articles, try a new Reader Level membership. To ensure we can keep bringing you thoughtful astrological commentary on world events, please join with a Core Community membership.

Regional instability in the Middle East has gone on so long that it has formed new and ugly flowers in Europe, Lebanon, Iraq, Kenya and Palestine. Action creates reaction. Is this how we want the world to be?

I found this parable, posted by a friend of mine on Facebook the morning after the attacks:

One evening an old Cherokee told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, “My son, the battle is between two wolves inside us all. One is Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt,resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority and ego.

“The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion and faith.

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: “Which wolf wins?”

The old Cherokee simply replied, “The one you feed.”

I don’t know what comes next with these ongoing investigations in France and its neighboring countries. I know I am hoping for better than what our recent history has shown us. I know I am sending a heart-load of intention on this sunny Sunday in California that we find out what really happened Friday night, and deal with it with as little bloodshed as possible. This world has had enough.

There is so much we haven’t been told. I am also certain that there are many, many people here and around the world tired of being fed the easy answers. The people of this good, beautiful, tumultuous and complicated planet deserve so much more. For once, please, let the good wolf win.

Chart for the Nov. 13, 2015 ISIS terrorist attacks in Paris. View glyph key here.

Chart for the Nov. 13, 2015 ISIS terrorist attacks in Paris. View glyph key here.

The World We Promised Them

Last week, four blocks away from my old neighborhood near downtown Berkeley, Berkeley High School students staged a mass demonstration over the appearance of a racist epithet posted on one of the high school’s library computers. Two thousand of Berkeley High’s 3,000 students walked off campus en masse to march through Berkeley’s streets in protest.

Yesterday, 1,000 students marched and demonstrated in a planned gathering of civil disobedience in Washington DC, demanding “racial, immigration, and climate justice reform for a ‘broken’ political system.”

Also yesterday, Tim Wolfe, system president of the University of Missouri, resigned his post after months of pressure from the university’s student body, who were pushing their administration to act on what was described as a climate of fear and racial intimidation on campus.

What finally pushed him to resign was the boycott by the university’s football team of the school’s upcoming football game this next weekend. Their boycott was in solidarity with the campus anti-racist movement, and had the absolute support of the team’s coach. The boycott and the game’s cancellation would have cost the school a financial loss of $1 million.

But there was plenty more than just a football game leading up to Wolfe’s resignation. In what the campus’ newspaper, “The Maneater,” described fatefully as “An Historic Fall”, the university had been a focal point for social unrest and is a microcosm of what is happening across the country.

It started with the cutting of health care for graduate students, many of whom work on campus; a grad student walk-out; student demonstrations over threatened discontinuation of abortion and other women’s health services; and demonstrations against an increasing climate of racism on campus. Graduate student Jonathan Butler spearheaded the graduate student movement earlier in the fall, and bumped up the stakes by waging a hunger strike until President Wolfe resigned.

The students’ demands — presented in a meeting earlier in the fall with campus administration — were handled sluggishly at best, if at all. President Wolfe was slow and dismissive of the students’ call for the administration to make the campus a “safe and inclusive place.” That meeting was then followed by a racism-based attack — the smearing of a swastika made from human feces in a campus residence hall.

It was Butler’s hunger strike that spurred the football team’s boycott, the final straw leading to Wolfe’s resignation. Apparently, concern for human rights and safety needed the help of college athletics to help the blind see the light.

Planet Waves new Reader Level membership gives easy website access to anyone who has reached their click-limit (tell your friends!). If you're looking for email delivery of horoscopes, plus real-time SMS service and more, try a Core Community membership.

Planet Waves new Reader Level membership gives easy website access to anyone who has reached their click-limit (tell your friends!). If you’re looking for email delivery of horoscopes, plus real-time SMS service and more, try a Core Community membership.

If it appears that President Wolfe refused to see the big picture, the students knew it all too well. Their demands: removal of Wolfe as UM president; that UM meets the demands of the Legion of Black Collegians first presented in 1969 for the betterment of the black community — a promise unkept for nearly fifty years; enforcement of a mandatory comprehensive racial awareness and inclusion curriculum throughout all campus departments overseen by students staff and faculty of color; and an increase of the percentage of black faculty and students campus-wide by 10%.

Their demands also included a 10-year plan to increase retention rate for marginalized students; sustain diversity curriculum and promote campus safety and inclusivity; increase resources to include mental health professionals — particularly those of color for outreach and programming campus-wide; and establish social justice centers on campus.

To complete our frame of reference, the University of Missouri is located in Columbia, a two-hour drive from St. Louis and Ferguson. Both cities have been at the epicenter of the Black Lives Matter movement in the Midwest, protesting police aggression against African Americans following the deaths of black people at the hands of police.

From my view — at four blocks, 2,500 and 3,000 miles away — my heart is a mixture of pride, apprehension and hope. Some of us have been focused more on survival and — if we were lucky — comfort. We were too bogged down by the distractions of day-to-day reality to peek over our newspapers and hand-held devices and understand what has been happening to us. But these kids in Berkeley, Washington DC, and Columbia — and our kids everywhere — have been watching it all too closely.

They are about to enter their adult lives. They’re trying to blossom into adulthood as young people should, even in what sometimes can mildly be called a dark and dangerous world. These demonstrations are a sign of hope that our youth are actively working towards a world better than the one we are leaving them. They are fighting for the world we promised them, long ago when we were young. Send them support, encouragement and a light to help them continue safely on their way.

Please Let Us Play Softball

Here’s your entertainment in the theater of irony. CNBC, the network responsible for the birth of the Tea Party Movement, is called on the carpet for asking what amounted to “silly” and frustration-producing questions of the “serious” Republican field of 15 candidates at the third Republican debate in Colorado.

After last Wednesday night’s CNBC debate, Reince Priebus, the Republican National Committee chair put his foot down. He cancelled NBC’s Republican debate for February — right at the beginning of the primaries — due to the “bad faith approach” of the CNBC debate format. In his letter to Andrew Lack, Chairman of NBC News, Priebus charged:

CNBC billed the debate as one that would focus on “the key issues that matter to all voters — job growth, taxes, technology, retirement and the health of our national economy.” That was not the case. Before the debate, the candidates were promised an opening question on economic or financial matters. That was not the case. Candidates were promised that speaking time would be carefully monitored to ensure fairness. That was not the case. Questions were inaccurate or downright offensive. The first question directed to one of our candidates asked if he was running a comic book version of a presidential campaign, hardly in the spirit of how the debate was billed.

When CNBC’s panel asked the candidates to expound on the Trump candidacy as a “comic book version of a presidential campaign” — which, by the way, was absolutely on the freaking money — the RNC’s criticism of this and similar questions asked at last week’s debate had to be taken seriously.

The Republican National Committee was so upset by CNBC’s handling of the Colorado debate that it cancelled its deal with CNBC’s parent company, NBC, to broadcast the RNC’s debate of February 2016 — at a time when the Presidential primaries begin in earnest. That rung NBC’s bell. Loudly. They have a bottom line to protect. They need to make money by broadcasting political debates and running political ads.

By Sunday night — after meetings, tweets, threats, demands and push-back between representatives of the networks and the Republican campaigns — Ben Ginsberg, attorney for the Republicans, drafted this letter template to go to the TV networks. It incorporates the expectations, understanding of limitations, appeals for “fairness” and serious coverage of the debates:

Dear _____:

This letter is on behalf of the 15 Republican Presidential campaigns. We are aware that you are sponsoring a debate on _____ at ______. Below and attached are questions about your debate to which the campaigns would appreciate answers at your earliest convenience, and in any event no later than a month from today.

The answers you provide to these questions are part of a process that each campaign will use to determine whether its candidate will participate in your debate. All the candidates recognize that robust debates are an important part of the primary elections. It is also important that all debates be appropriate platforms for discussing substantive issues and the candidates’ visions for the future.

To achieve this going forward, the campaigns ask that you:

— Answer the questions below within 30 days of receipt by communicating directly with the campaigns. We’ll provide an email list for that distribution.

— No later than a month before your debate (earlier if possible), schedule a conference with all the campaigns participating jointly so that the campaigns may ask questions about the format for your debate, the moderators and your answers to the questions below. The campaigns may request an additional call(s) to discuss specific issues.

— The campaigns will use the manner in which your debate(s) are run (and changes you say you will make from your past debates), the quality and fairness of your moderators’ questions, their enforcement of the rules and their ability to achieve parity in distribution and quality of questions and time among the candidates to evaluate whether the candidates wish to participate in your future debates.

— In addition, based on their evaluation of previous debates, the campaigns wish to have in all future debates a minimum 30-second opening statement and a minimum 30-second closing statement for each participant; candidate pre-approval of any graphics and bios you plan to include in your broadcast about each candidate, and that there be no “lightning rounds” because of their frivolousness or “gotcha” nature, or in some cases both.

The campaigns appreciate your participation to achieve what they feel is a great need for more accountability and transparency in their primary debate process. In addition to addressing the above points, please answer the following:

Where and when will the debate be held? What are criteria for inclusion? If you choose to base this on polls, please detail which polls and why each poll’s methodology and sample size is acceptable to you. Who is the moderator? Will there be any additional questioners? Are they seated?

What is the estimated audience for the debate? Will it be disseminated on-line? By radio? Will it be disseminated by other means and do you have any additional partners? What format do you envision – podiums, table, other? Will there be questions from the audience or social media? How many? How will they be presented to the candidates? Will you acknowledge that you, as the sponsor, take responsibility for all questions asked, even if not asked by your personnel?

What is your proposed length of the debate? Will there be opening and closing statements? How long will they be? Will you commit to provide equal time/an equal number of questions of equal quality (substance as opposed to “gotcha” or frivolous) to each candidate? How long are the answers and rebuttals? If a candidate is mentioned, will he/she automatically be called on so they can rebut? Will there be a gong/buzzer/bell when time is up? How will the moderator enforce the time limits?

Will you commit that you will not: Ask the candidates to raise their hands to answer a question; ask yes/no questions without time to provide a substantive answer; Have a “lightning round”; Allow candidate-to-candidate questioning; Allow props or pledges by the candidates; Have reaction shots of members of the audience or moderators during debates; Show an empty podium after a break (describe how far away the bathrooms are); Use behind shots of the candidates showing their notes; Leave microphones on during breaks; Allow members of the audience to wear political messages (shirts, buttons, signs, etc.). Who enforces?

What is the size of the audience? Who is receiving tickets in addition to the candidates? Who’s in charge of distributing those tickets and filling the seats? What instructions will you provide to the audience about cheering during the debate? What are the plans for the lead-in to the debate (Pre-shot video? Announcer to moderator? Director to Moderator?) and how long is it? Are you running promo ads before the debate about your moderator(s)? What type of microphones (lavs or podium)? Can you pledge that the temperature in the hall be kept below 67 degrees?

If there is any additional information you would like to provide the candidates and the campaigns, please do so. Thank you for your cooperation. Should you have any questions, the campaigns will be pleased to answer them.

Sincerely,
__________

On the surface, the concerns of the RNC appear reasonable; but the kind of politics the candidates discuss and the virulence their platforms and talking points generate — either at debate or on the stump — go beyond reasonableness. Some of the Republican candidates are completely nuts.

Are you the political black sheep in your family? Welcome to the most sane forum for discussing politics on the Internet. You can now get access to articles posted on this website through Planet Waves' new reader-level membership? So if you have friends who've reached their click-limit, pass it along. Our Core Community membership still gets you email delivery, plus other perks.

Are you the political black sheep in your family? Welcome to the most sane forum for discussing politics on the Internet. You can now get access to articles posted on this website through Planet Waves’ new reader-level membership. Tell your friends, no matter what their party.

The level of information prep and production control requested in the letter indicates to me they don’t want the candidates to be shown as they are. They don’t want the hard questions thrown at them. Poor things.

It’s funny. We’re dealing with the party of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, fathers of the killer “gotcha” moments complicit with the media for use in character assassination. And they are masters in Goebbels’ practice of repeating lies until they become truth. And yet now they’re whining for fairness from a news media grown used to info-sop and surrogate attack interviews, where people shout over each other instead of thoughtfully answering questions.

They’re chastising CNBC — the very network responsible for the birth of the Tea Party. I am sure the Republicans are hoping no one notices that it’s their own rules of engagement they want changed — for them. But they made their bed a while back. Time to lie in it.

This is what election politics has become: entertaining disinformation. And looking at this colorful Republican cast of 15 characters saying anything they can to make headway in such a crowded field provides some very interesting entertainment indeed. Karma can sometimes be a cruel mistress, particularly if you’ve been on the dishing end of it, and even more when you’re feigning victim-hood from media unfairness and trying to get away with it. 

They’re asking the media to play softball for them. When you trade down from the hardball of the big leagues to softball, you need to remember that a softball is bigger and far more visibly obvious to those even casually watching. People get when they’re being played down to.

In their defense, CNBC vice president of communications Brian Steel said, “People who want to be president of the United States should be able to answer tough questions.”

Let’s see if the Republicans don’t trip over the bar they’re asking networks to lower.