Category Archives: Welcome

Valentine’s Day Astrology Roundup

Elisa in the curio mirror. Photo by Eric Francis / Book of Blue.

Elisa in the curio mirror. Photo by Eric Francis / Book of Blue.

Dear Friend and Reader:

Here’s a bit of Valentine’s Day astrology. I would say the theme of the chart today is to focus on the point of contact. If you’re in a relationship or you’re interested in someone, what is it you like? What is it that you want? If you love someone, what is it you love? That’s your point of contact.

Do you really know what someone loves about you? You might give that some thought, because that’s another helpful, necessary point of contact.

Taurus Moon opposite Scorpio Mars (exact at 7:13 pm EST) is a real meeting. There is some energy in that aspect, some passion, some urgency and a lot of yummy sexual desire.

If this aspect is describing conflict, it’s likely to be because someone is either projecting their stuff onto their partner (oppositions can describe projection), or maintaining an unnecessarily fixed position (these planets are both in fixed signs, that’s the clue).

It takes some maturity to say, “I could be more flexible.” It takes maturity for people to recognize that they are autonomous beings, and that a relationship is nothing if not about respect for the individuality of your partner. A couple is a group, and a group is the coming together of autonomous individuals.

Continue reading

Teacher ethics and the limits of friendship and fear

I recently encountered a pair of posts on the New Zealand-based website The Yoga Lunchbox. Taken together, they create some food for thought about the nature of teacher-student ethics, boundaries, consent, power dynamics (real or perceived), interpretations of “friendship,” and whether a healthy close personal relationship necessarily runs counter to a healthy teacher-student dynamic.

Kara-Leah Grant (left) and Cameron Shayne in their video interview.

Kara-Leah Grant (left) and Cameron Shayne talk ethics, power dynamics, sex, freedom to choose, polarization and Yoga culture.

Both posts are focused on the environment of Yoga classes, but I suspect many of the ideas can be extrapolated to other teacher-student situations.

Of course, with Yoga, we get the question of how an ancient ‘spiritual’ practice with such an emphasized physical component (at least in popular culture) might add layers of complexity to the questions posed.

In the first piece, Kara-Leah Grant interviews author and Yoga teacher Donna Farhi. Much of the interview centers on Donna’s responses regarding the nature of the relationship between a Yoga teacher and their student. Farhi asserts that to become a personal ‘friend’ to a student weakens or subverts an effective teacher-student dynamic in Yoga, and clearly holds herself and others to high ethical standards.

This topic stems from Grant’s introduction of yoga teacher Mark Whitwell’s assertion that Yoga can only be transmitted in relationship, and that he defines that relationship as friendship. Normally I do not advocate reading the comments sections on most websites, but the comments under this piece contain the suggestion by a man that perhaps men and women define “friendship” differently and have different expectations around it, and that perhaps that is contributing to a misunderstanding.

In the second Yoga Lunchbox piece, Kara-Leah Grant introduces a video interview with Yoga teacher Cameron Shayne, who kicked up a shitstorm in the Yoga community when he wrote an article asserting that two consenting adults in teacher-student roles should be free to decide for themselves whether they want to engage in a sexual relationship.

As Grant notes, regarding the vitriolic comments and rebuttal articles Shayne’s piece engendered, “This is a hot topic — power, sex, ethics and the teacher/student relationship. The difficulty lies not in determining what is right or wrong but in our ability to communicate with each other when these buttons are being pushed.”

I encourage you to watch the full interview, no matter how much Shayne might rub you the wrong way at times. Apropos of Eric’s recent writings about Saturn conjunct the Great Attractor, Shayne’s stance and personality are polarizing. Are many of his statements just a cop-out on having personal and professional ethics? Or are his remarks about fear — how it teaches us, and how it shows us where our inner work is in this lifetime — right on the mark? If he pushes your buttons or provokes your fear (which might come through as anger), are you still able to listen?

I’m not sure I’ve entirely made up my mind about Shayne. But I think both he and Farhi raise important questions, and I offer kudos to Grant for holding space for the conversation.

The Morning After in Rome

Late Saturday night on the eve of Super Bowl Sunday, I drove the streets of the South of Market district in San Francisco, my usual route to get to the freeway that takes me back home to Oakland. While waiting for the light to change on Division Street — a four-lane thoroughfare under Highway 101 North to Golden Gate Bridge — a long line of homeless men were huddled next to pillars, readying themselves to sleep on the Division Street meridian for the night.

fe-logo-13-feb-09-250-px1

A generous young couple braced themselves, looking left and right as they completed a dangerous walk across aggressive traffic, bringing with them their camper tent for a few of the homeless under the freeway. One, maybe two, people could sleep in it comfortably.

Undoubtedly, there would be more crammed in there. In February, San Francisco gets cold at night.

As I turned the corner, a long line of young people four-deep waited outside a local nightclub. The line snaked around the block. Double-parked in front of the club, a young man was texting — unaware that he was taking up two lanes while lines of cars wormed their way around him to get home. I honked him into awareness and he pulled over. Similar scenes were happening all along that same street, clubs filled with partiers taking Saturday night long into early Super Bowl Sunday morning.

I knew from my friends who work in SF County Jail that during the two weeks prior to Super Bowl weekend, the police jailed most of the homeless. Keeping them out of sight from the two massive development areas — Justin Hermann Plaza and Moscone Center — was a priority for the NFL’s Super Bowl Host Committee’s designated pre-game celebrations.

It was surprising to see more homeless underneath the freeway last Saturday, but that might have been due to the additional pressure of one million additional people coming to party or go to the game Super Bowl weekend. The hotels wanted to keep the downtown tourist areas free of poor people. And the jails were probably at capacity.

The pressure on public services, plus street and commuter traffic, was enormous — cutting off major in-city commuter arteries to set up what amounted to a Football Disneylandia at the Embarcadero (our trendy bay side neighborhood called Super Bowl City.) 500,000 people came to watch continuous free concert performances from local artists and Grammy award-winning musicians over the weekend. Throughout the week, demonstrators lined the block where Super Bowl City was set.

In December of last year, the police shot and killed a young black man named Mario Woods in the Bayview Hunter’s Point area — one of the city’s poorest neighborhoods. He was unarmed. It was caught on cellphone video.

Adding Wood’s death to the long long list of grievances already caused by the Dot-Com Boom 2 and the ensuing development driving working-class families out of the city due to astronomically high rents, the city had more than enough on their hands in keeping demonstrations contained. Mayor Ed Lee — who, throughout his first term oversaw the accelerated gentrification of the city by the tech industry — continues to face hostile demonstrations at City Hall and elsewhere. The Super Bowl is just one more of the thousand cuts that’s pushed long-time residents and the working class of the city to the edge.

It’s over. Three long years of planning with the National Football League and a large cluster of corporate sponsors produced the empire’s annual spectacle for the plebs — locally, and nationally on television. The NFL took over an entire region — the western Bay Area with its six million people — for the 50th Super Bowl, also known as SB50 for short.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available, and do are the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or individual signs here.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available for instant access, and so are the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or select individual signs here.

It takes much in resources from an area to produce these games, which are in essence the amusements of empire: the gladiators; the bread and circus; the sweeping under the carpet of human misery so as not bring a downer onto the people who can afford jacked-up hotel prices and Super Bowl tickets. This is what we expect of Rome. Looking at the sponsors for these various events this last week, you can see what this empire is made of.

Fortunately we are still, last time I checked, a first-world country, and our region is even more first world than others. So we can take this on, economically. But there remains the social cost. Long-term problems like homelessness, police brutality, and the pressure of gentrification fester hotter underneath, and are ready to explode because of this. Working-class people — the very people who like the game — are being forced out the city they live in. Forget that they could ever even afford an NFL season ticket, let alone admission to the Super Bowl.

All empires have to do to keep us in line and not complain is to create temporary distraction. With its glorification of American machismo and the passion it generates — real and manufactured — the NFL is corporate Rome’s greatest distraction machine.

With each and every empire throughout history, the disruption of human lives remains the regrettable price of spectacle. I wish for my town that the money they spent on public services and safety — garbage collection, street cleaning, traffic control — could have gone to homeless shelters, or better yet, actual housing for people who need it. It pisses me and a lot of people off that the Big Football Show came here. We can’t afford to be distracted when — amidst the revelry, the partying and the crowds — so many of us are about to be crushed.

The Vision Quest Audio Readings are Ready

Dear Friend and Reader:

We are pleased to announce the Vision Quest audio astrology and rune readings are now published. I wanted to share some samples with you; these are below, one astrology and one rune sample per sign, along with photos of the rune readings. There’s also a link to the written reading excerpts and content lists.

I hope you enjoy the samples. Like what you hear? Get all 12 signs of Vision Quest at this link, or choose individual signs here.

Continue reading

homermelt

Mercury Conjunct Pluto, Stationing Direct, Mixed Up with the Leo Full Moon: Of Meltdowns and Breakthroughs

Dear Friend and Reader:

Mercury stations direct Monday, after nearly three weeks retrograde first in Aquarius then in Capricorn. What is so interesting about this station-direct is that it involves two conjunctions of Mercury to Pluto in Capricorn. At the moment, this is happening in the run-up to Saturday’s Full Moon in Leo.

There was a conjunction of these two planets prior to Mercury retrograde, on Dec. 19, right before the southern solstice; that date may remind you of something or someone.

homermelt

Don’t have a meltdown! Have a breakthrough!

Mercury, now in retrograde motion, is conjunct Pluto. That was exact Friday, Jan. 22 at 4:59 am EST (09:59 UTC), so it’s still happening now. This happens with Pluto currently moving slowly past the midpoint of Capricorn, indicating that this long phase of history is half-over. (In case you’re wondering, Pluto enters Aquarius for the first time on March 23, 2023).

Closer to home, Mercury stations direct Monday, Jan. 25 at 4:50 pm (21:50 UTC). Then Mercury, moving in direct motion, will be conjunct Pluto on Saturday, Jan. 30 at 12:59 am EST (05:59 UTC).

Said simply without any numbers, Mercury will make a conjunction to Pluto Friday, then station direct Monday, then make another conjunction to Pluto a week from Saturday. Really though, the conjunction remains close enough to be considered continuous, but with two peaks. We have the planet of mind, communication and awareness aligning with Pluto, the planet of depth, death, transformation and surrender, with all those terms multiplied by sex.

This is a hormonal moment, and this alignment can represent various forms of focused, deep thought, obsession, breakthrough, transformation or, for some, meltdowns. In today’s horoscope, Sally Brompton was advising readers to take a deep breath, and count to 10 before getting too pissed off (out loud). This is what she was talking about.

Then combine all this with the Full Moon and you might experience, or witness, some really impressive emotional fireworks. It may take some consciousness to keep calm and cool enough to keep focused enough to navigate all this energy.

Continue reading

Our Inner Tyrant

At last and alas, the primary season looms before us. As is customary for me, I always pay attention when my friend, political consultant Richard (Dick) Bell, posts an article in the public interest on Facebook.

fe-logo-13-feb-09-250-px1

Dick was one of my mentors when I was involved with the Kerry campaign in 2003-04 as a blogger and blog moderator. I have always relied on and trusted his take on the complexities of political campaigns and DC politics in general. He is always spot-on.

So I took notice when he posted this Politico article,”The One Weird Trait that Predicts Whether You’re a Trump Supporter,” written by longtime Democratic pollster Matt MacWilliams. It describes in depth what we here at Planet Waves have guessed all along: Trump triggers the mystic yearning for a strong man — the one who an authoritarian type will obey.

MacWilliams writes:

“My finding is the result of a national poll I conducted in the last five days of December under the auspices of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, sampling 1,800 registered voters across the country and the political spectrum. Running a standard statistical analysis, I found that education, income, gender, age, ideology and religiosity had no significant bearing on a Republican voter’s preferred candidate. Only two of the variables I looked at were statistically significant: authoritarianism, followed by fear of terrorism, though the former was far more significant than the latter.

Authoritarianism is not a new, untested concept in the American electorate. Since the rise of Nazi Germany, it has been one of the most widely studied ideas in social science. While its causes are still debated, the political behavior of authoritarians is not. Authoritarians obey. They rally to and follow strong leaders. And they respond aggressively to outsiders, especially when they feel threatened. From pledging to “make America great again” by building a wall on the border to promising to close mosques and ban Muslims from visiting the United States, Trump is playing directly to authoritarian inclinations.

So, those who say a Trump presidency “can’t happen here” should check their conventional wisdom at the door. The candidate has confounded conventional expectations this primary season because those expectations are based on an oversimplified caricature of the electorate in general and his supporters in particular. Conditions are ripe for an authoritarian leader to emerge. Trump is seizing the opportunity. And the institutions — from the Republican Party to the press — that are supposed to guard against what James Madison called “the infection of violent passions” among the people have either been cowed by Trump’s bluster or are asleep on the job.

The US primary season kicks off Feb. 1 with the Iowa caucuses. Already people have formed their opinions on the candidates, and it’s probably easier to find more now who made their decisions than back in September.

I am not saying you should be alarmed. I am suggesting you be aware. There are many people from both sides of the social, political and cultural fence who feel disoriented by the number of changes that have taken place in the US these last seven years.

We elected an African-American President. Twice. The Supreme Court has legalized gay marriage. Marijuana is legal in three states, and though the movement has been slowed or resisted in some states, the interest remains in other states to pursue legalization. California already legalized medical marijuana and should have gone for the full ball of wax years ago. And, even with all its flaws and an uncertain future, people have access to (relatively) affordable health care.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available, and Eric is working on the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or individual signs here.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available for instant access, and Eric is working on the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or select individual signs here.

These are such new and distressing concepts to many people — those who are fixated on ‘the way things were’ — that going backwards in time through the promises of a bombastic strongman seems comfortable and right. Even though we know, especially in the case of Trump’s foreign policy and immigration proposals, that they’re neither.

As the article implies, this is what fear of uncertainty and change will create: the white-knuckled hold on a past that is slipping away, and along with it a shift in power. We’re moving from male-dominated to female-included, and from a white majority to a growing multi-ethnic one.

But we cannot hold onto time through our inner tyrants and their outer representations. It’s useless to be afraid of what we’ll lose if we do change. We’ve already changed. We are different, still feeling out who we are and where we’re going.

This primary season is the starting point of where we go as a country; who we want to be in the world and to each other, inside and out of our borders. Let us prove to ourselves how much we’ve grown.

Publishing Schedule Change

Hello — Amanda Moreno’s column is moving to Wednesdays at noon (or thereabouts). She will not have a column today to give her time to write for Wednesday, so please look for her piece then. In the meantime, Judith Gayle, Sarah Taylor and guest-writer Christina Louise Dietrich have all published articles this weekend, and we’d love to read your thoughts on them. — Amanda P.

On Death, Gender, & the Orgasm as a Performance of Femininity

This week’s relationship-themed guest-post comes from Christina Louise Dietrich, whom we’ve featured a few times in the last year or so. She writes about her healing journey at her own blog. — Amanda P.

By Christina Louise Dietrich

I am now 44 years old. I am a mother and a head of household. I am past the age where people used to be generally considered “over the hill.” From a transition standpoint, this is significant for me personally because there’s only one generation remaining between me and mortality: the generation of my mother and her siblings. My next big generational shift will be to matriarch/crone. My mother’s will be to death.

Christina Louise Dietrich

Christina Louise Dietrich

My mother’s death isn’t imminent, but it is inevitable, and even though only in her early 60’s she has had a fair share of medical scares. Cancer. Stroke. Falls with broken bones. A choking incident that brought her dangerously close to asphyxiating if it hadn’t been for my stepfather finding and resuscitating her. All these events remind me of her mortality by keeping it in the peripheral vision of my mind’s eye. Watching. Waiting for each of us to advance another rung on the generational ladder.

On Day of the Dead, I set up an altar to the matriarchs in my family; I put my attention on my maternal great-grandmother, my maternal grandmother, and my mother. I’ve spent a lot of time in therapy the last four years talking about these women and the not-insignificant effects they had not only on me but each another. As an ancestral line, I can clearly see the traits handed down to me courtesy of them, some of which include strength, anxiety, determination, a high need for control, frugality, tenacity, and a deep sense of familial duty/sacrifice/obligation.

The altar is still intact and I continue to feel their presence, hear their voices. Even more strongly now than before—I think, because I’m calling out for their support and wisdom. Because I can feel myself beginning to prepare energetically and psychically for the death of my mother. Even if it’s only theoretical at this stage, as a planner who is finely attuned to transitions, doorways, and liminal spaces it’s a transformation that’s especially potent for me during this season of darkening.

What I’m feeling into right now is how the process of her dying will change the dynamic of our relatedness; how she will take on more child-like qualities and I will assume the more parental role. I see the possibility for me to support her more in the coming years; to take the skills I’ve learned through parenting Avery and re-parenting myself, and leveraging those to hold a more compassionate, patient space for her. After all, she has a high need for control just like I do and as she loses control over more of her self, I anticipate the need for a lot of patience on my end.

As if sitting with the impending death of my mother weren’t intense enough, it’s also bringing up older, deeper body memories for me. Because this isn’t the first time she and I have danced with power dynamics and leaned on one another for support.

Embodying the Masculine as a Girl Child

When I was 5 years old, my mother and I (and my 3-year-old sister) were in a pretty shitty situation. My sexually, physically, and emotionally abusive biological father had just left us for the last time because my mother stood up to him, and told him to get out and never come back. An act of strength and courage I have since thanked her for many times. An act that while freeing us from him, also left us in a position of needing to depend on one another more directly, more concretely.

Like many women who had been trapped by domestic abuse, she was literally at rock bottom; overwhelmed, exhausted, deeply wounded, and also needing to care for two small children. Even with the local support of her parents and brothers, it was still really hard at home. She needed me to be her “big girl,” to be strong and help her with baby Theresa when she got overwhelmed. She needed me to carry a lot more emotional and psychic weight than was appropriate given my age and equally vulnerable position.

I was naturally precocious in the ways of care-taking and helping; I was a sensitive, empathetic, deeply-feeling child from a long line of caretakers and emotional baggage handlers. And so, when my mother needed someone to be strong for her, someone she could count on to always be there and love her, I became a source of support, reliability, and certainty for her in a world that seemed bent on hurting her. She could talk to me, share her feelings, and cry about how much it hurt. She could count on me to be relatively independent, capable, and self reliant.

I believe that I embodied the masculine to protect her from falling deeper into dysfunction, to protect my primary source of security, safety, and love. And yet none of it could be acknowledged as such; it was an unconscious resonance between us. She wasn’t consciously awake enough to recognize what was happening and I was a little girl desperate to ensure Mommy wouldn’t abandon or stop loving me.

And so, in a sense, we became psychically married, she and I. Co-dependent. Enmeshed. Tied together because of the wounds the patriarchy and my father inflicted, and we jointly had to recover from. As a result, I have always felt responsible for her well-being; responsible to be a sturdy framework against which she could drape her tired, bruised limbs and cry.

Being Told to Put on the Girl Suit

At the same time, despite how masculine and grown-up I felt in the relationship with my mother, I was obviously in the body of a young girl. I knew I was a girl and I’ve never felt any confusion or disgust about that fact; it’s just that I’ve never been comfortable or confident in my ability to perform femininity. The world was telling me to put on the pink suit and its myriad complicated accouterments, but at home I was clearly wearing something that approximated the blue suit, at least in function. Thus began my internal dissonance around gender and society’s expectations in regard to it.

As a cis-female born in 1971 America and raised by a traditionally-valued family, I’ve been handed a lot of narrowly-defined programming about how I’m supposed to look, what I’m allowed to do, and how I should conduct myself. As an androgynous, 6-foot-tall, anxious, suspicious woman with an advanced case of “Resting Bitch Face,” I’ve had a damn hard time manifesting those programs in ways that convince people.

Aside from the fact I live in a rape culture as a second-class citizen—which means I’ve been raped, get paid less than my male co-workers, and still have a hard time getting people to take me seriously—living in a female body has been pretty cool. I actually like being a woman, especially now that I’m in my 40’s. What I find so distasteful is trying to embody and perform femininity. Lace. Mini skirts. High heels. Makeup. Push-up bras. Smooth legs. An hourglass hip-to-waist ratio. An inviting smile. A willingness to be told what to think.

I worked hard to adopt the mannerisms and affectations of Society’s Desirable Feminine, or at least someone whose appearance shouted I’M READY TO GET FUCKED, which is essentially the same thing. These attributes and the dogged pursuit of them are what I hate about the mainstream definition of culturally-acceptable femininity. Because every single one of them is about oppression. Getting smaller. More contained. More malleable. Hobbled. Agreeable. Compliant. Tortured. Objectified.

What about the Christina suit? It’s contains an entire spectrum of colors and would allow me fluid movement. Does anyone want to see me wearing it? No?

Finding my Authentic Orgasmic Rhythm

One of the things they don’t tell you straight-away about performing femininity is the fact it’s arbitrary, often conflicting, and designed to keep you off balance. Embarrassed. Competitive. Ashamed. Inadequate. Because horizontal violence and oppression. For example, let’s look at the female orgasm.

Over the last few months I’ve discovered that my body doesn’t want to climax every time Brendan and I have sex. She actually prefers to do so every 2-3 times; a rhythm that allows Her to be literally fed by both our combined sexual energy and His semen. She wants to hold that energy inside her and use it to fuel all manner of erotic undertakings like blogging, cooking, and remembering how amazing it is to live inside this beautiful body. To fuel the remembering that Her pleasure is worth building and worth waiting for.

I’m standing in the shower one morning, seeing the truth of this newly-discovered rhythm, and wondering why it feels so revolutionary. I asked my body, “Body, why do you feel so amazed, relieved, and empowered to have discovered this?” The answer came, “Because I’ve been expected to have an orgasm every time we have sex.” Oh. Why? Because that’s a crucial part of performing femininity. According to popular media/porn, we all “know” when a woman has an orgasm because she’s loud and makes a big deal out of it, yelling and flailing around because the pleasure is just so epic.

The pleasure that the man is generating with his amazing, big, fat cock. OBVIOUSLY. So, once she has been thoroughly pleasured, that’s his signal—the sign that he’s “done a good job,” that he’s “earned” his release. That he can now cum, secure in the fact his penis is desirable, he’s an amazing lover, and he is worthy of further love and attention. His ego is intact. For the time being.

As the woman, what if I can’t or don’t want to have an orgasm? Well, now I’m coming dangerously close to bruising, crushing, or invalidating his ego and suffering the consequences. Because there will certainly be consequences and I’m the one who gets to clean up the emotional/psychological fallout. In this construct, preserving/protecting the male ego is MY responsibility and ensuring that ego feels secure all hinges on my ability to perform a convincing orgasm. Every time. Or else.

That’s a lot of pressure and my body has decades of it tamped down inside. Like I said, I’ve never been confident in my ability to perform femininity convincingly enough to ensure my safety.

Fortunately for me, I now have a partner whose aware of all that programming; both sides of it. He knows exactly what it’s like to have a fragile masculine ego that depends on near-constant feminine reassurance for its survival. And because he’s also committed to deep, bilateral healing in our relationship, he has given me a lot of space, time, and reassurance to find my rhythm. He doesn’t ask me to perform feminine sexuality for him unless I choose to do so. He wants to see pure, unadulterated, androgynous Christina and to discover what kind of sex SHE wants. What a fucking relief!

Loving Her as Loving Myself

So, my mother is going to die and with her will go the physical connection that my masculine has to her. How do I want to experience her in the time we have left? Over the years I have shared with her some of my childhood experience; how I’ve felt wounded by her inadequacies, how I’ve felt oppressed by and responsible for her pain, how it felt to be her daughter. Those were anxious, gut-churning encounters for me because holding up a mirror so my mother can see how she inadvertently wounded me took a lot of courage for me to do and for her to look.

It also hurt her. Because she knows she wasn’t the mother we both needed her to be. She couldn’t be. This world ensured she was broken by the time I came into her life. And I no longer feel the need to punish her for that, to try and get her to take responsibility for all the ways she let me down. For the ways she leaned on, squished, and controlled me. If she had the skill to be more respectful, validating, and supportive she would have been. I believe that with all that I am.

I’m a mother; I know how hard it is. And because we both know, it feels like I can now begin the final stages of individuating from her and claim my full identity. Every time I share space with her, feel her love for me, and feel my love for her, I can also step away from her with compassion, with respect. I can complete the process that allows me to transition past, through and with her.



Christina Louise Dietrich, a technical writer by trade, says of herself: “I write because I am claiming the voice my family and my society tried to silence, the voice that was my divine birthright. I am a woman, a mother, a feminist, a wife. I am compassionate, judgmental, loving, a bully, empathetic, obstinate, caring, rigid, and creative. I’m passionate about systems, beauty, process, experience, trees, interconnections, transitions, logistics, balance, and clarity. I manifest the Amazon, the Androgyne, and the Mother-to-be-Crone.”