By Judith Gayle | Political Waves
Doesn’t it seem as though we’re finally deciding who we’re going to be when we grow up — or at least as we face some of the most difficult and far-reaching existential challenges of our species? I heard two pundits arguing this morning. One, a Trump supporter, said, “Oh, calm down, this isn’t the end of the world,” to which the other replied, “It might be.” Now there’s a progressive dog whistle if I’ve ever heard one.
There is a sense that this moment, this election process, these decisions we’re making, are for all the marbles. That comes on the heels of all the twists and turns we’ve witnessed these last weeks, months, years. It’s been a lot to take in, a lot to pull through our intellect and into our intuition, and now — as we enter this equinox, sandwiched between potent eclipses — we’re being asked to move on that information under a powerful Aries stimulus.
As the first sign of the zodiac, Aries is like a baby just born and howling: it isn’t easily ignored. It’s in constant motion, pursuing its desires, riding the headwinds of its passions and establishing itself as the initial impulse of the universe. Its enthusiasm sweeps everything along with it. If we needed a fire lit under our bum to get us up and moving, Aries comes with a BIC and a grin, so consider this a warning: if you’re still just sitting there, undecided, you’re likely to get scorched.
This has been another of those weeks when we’ve been hit with so much incoming information, it’s a chore to untangle implications, but it’s worth a try. It’s a dangerous form of denial to think that what these political figures do has little or no impact on our lives (and I think it’s high time we had a lot more impact on theirs).
Having lost the nomination in his home state on Tuesday, “Little Marco” Rubio has exited the race, in fact has abandoned politics altogether. He tells us that after his senatorial tenure is up, he will become a private citizen, and gladly. Surprised? I am. I figured we’d be dealing with him decades down the line.
And now, despite Trump promising riots if he’s denied the nod by any so-called ‘rules,’ establishment Pubs have come together to do anything they can to stop him, including holding their noses to embrace Ted Cruz. Once again, focusing on the horror that is Donald keeps us from recognizing the horror that is Ted.
I’m seriously distressed that someone like Ted Cruz (who is more to the far-right on the political scale than Trump has ever been) should fall heir to establishment approval, no matter the goad. The implications are frightening. Should Trump lose, he will pout for a while, then shrug and go on to make more deals and more money and more outrageous statements, but what will his disappointed followers do, now that race/class violence has received blanket approval? We will be forced to deal with overt racism, one way or another.
Keeping his pledge, Obama nominated a SCOTUS candidate, throwing Republican legislators into a frenzy of ideological panic and obstruction, which pundits tell us is unprecedented. While no shock, it also comes with an unprecedented amount of truthfulness: the conservatives have no intention of giving up hope for the continuance of a conservative court and they’re not afraid to say so. That court has been their ace in the hole, the object of their plan to establish a minimalist government and Federalist nation, for decades.
They will snub Obama’s candidate unless Hillary wins, when they will happily vet the nominee for fear she would propose someone farther to the left. Essentially, this proposed candidate is, historically and by current opinion, acceptable to the Pubs except that he comes with Dem bona fides, nominated by the black guy and set to take the place of a justice so beloved of the archaic right that public outcry might throw Nancy Reagan out of her resting place next to her husband in order to give Nino her spot in the continually radiating warmth of St. Ronnie’s bones..
Much as only a Republican can be a ‘real American,’ only a Republican-approved originalist of ‘great intellect,’ like his/her (ha!) predecessor can take the place of Antonin Scalia. The Pub obstruction in this matter — along with Mitch McConnell’s lame-ass explanation for it — is as blatantly unconstitutional as anything they’ve accused Obama of for years now, and that’s plenty.
It seems to me that the actual split in this nation — like the in-fighting of Shias and Sunnis in the Middle East — resides within the interpretation of the Constitution. This has been an Achilles Heel since our nation’s inception, i.e., those who did not want a unified government as opposed to those who did, briefly united by the need to get the king’s knee off their necks. Or, as Franklin put it, “A republic, if we can keep it.”
Nonetheless, hedging for much of a year to replace a significant American Justice IS unconstitutional obstruction and Robert Reich has a little clip explaining the situation and asking for your advocacy, thanks to MoveOn which has given him a platform for his series of highly educational cartoon YouTubes. Go here to watch, and pass it around.
Obama’s nominee, Mr. Garland, while a fine man and worthy judge, is not nearly liberal enough for either Bernie or me, and the nomination was my first concern when I heard that Scalia, like Elvis, had left the building. In such a divisive political season, there is no way to escape further rancor on this front. Many on the left counseled Obama to pick a true liberal since the chance of confirmation was moot.
Instead, and not surprising to Obama watchers, our pragmatic Prez selected a moderate, and one who has very little track record on cases important to the left — those kinds of cases are often settled in the lower court — but we can’t welcome this judge with cheers and fireworks until we have some notion of how he sees Citizens United or Roe vs. Wade. The left has its bias, as well, and it might be a long time before we know much of anything. McConnell has refused to meet with Judge Garland, period.
In other news, Super Tuesday votes solidified the position of the presidential front-runners, which pundits tell us changes everything. Trump swept the votes as did Hillary. It seems all but impossible for Bernie to get the necessary delegates to win the nomination now, but his supporters remain enthusiastic, his message larger than his political aspirations and, as he’s financed by contributions alone, he is being encouraged to continue his march across the primary map.
I’m proud of my state for splitting the Sanders/Clinton vote so closely that it took two days to sort out, especially since the Dem Governor, along with Senator Claire McCaskill, who had already pledged her Super Delegate vote to Clinton, had issued statements saying that Sanders didn’t share “Missouri values.” Out of some 650,000+ votes, Hillary won Missouri by just a little over 1,500. With the vote so close to the bone, a recount is indicated but Bernie said ” … he would not request a recount of the state’s results because it would not be likely to affect the number of delegates awarded to the two candidates. “I would prefer to save the taxpayers of Missouri some money….”
Gotta give it to him, Bernie walks his talk and his message hits the heart. It’s a real tragedy that Trump gets billions of dollars worth of free ‘news’ coverage to spread his hate-speak, while Bernie’s message of reconstruction and remediation goes begging. His speech on Tuesday night was NOT covered by cable news as they were waiting for Trump to show up — not running a Trump response, mind you, but WAITING for one. This kind of easy dismissal is going to get even worse now, as Sanders is pressured by the establishment to bow out and get behind the presumptive, even though she appears somewhat wobbly in the general election against what will be, one way or another, a ruthless opponent.
Sanders, on the other hand, continues to grow his base. His answer to the anger issues driving Trump’s popularity is informed and intelligent, rather than bluster and bite. As a TruthOut op/ed put it:
However, what Sanders has tapped into is more than just anger. People have gravitated toward him not just because they are righteously angry at the way things are, but also because they see in him an earnest and lifelong passion for justice. They perceive in his campaign something that has been lost and needs to be recovered — an authentic (rather than opportunistic) sense that an ethical orientation in politics grounded on fairness, democracy, and the common good is not something that just “happens,” but something for which we must collectively fight.
Sanders’ recent political campaign is just another chapter in a book that he has been writing over the course of 50 years — a book that gives life to something that has been stomped on by the neoliberal agenda, but has deep roots in the psyche of most Americans: compassion and care for the other.
There it is: the description of the movement Sanders has headed, whether he gathers the necessary delegates for the presidency or not. While Trump justifies the violence that has become his trademark by insisting that his supporters are passionate about their love of America (white, male America, of course), it’s Sanders who has given us a clear sense of “We, not me,” and compassion for those who have little or no power in the political system. Mrs. Clinton, in an obvious attempt to appeal to both Sanders progressives and black churches in Memphis, speaks now for “love and kindness” as well. If that’s the new Dem position, we win no matter who takes the most votes.
Passion whispers “This feels good to me, I want it.” Compassion, the higher octave of passion, whispers, “This is good for us, this heals us.” The obvious choice is for some level of mutual concern for one another, but we’re still deciding if that’s worth our active participation or our passive approval, our disdain over matters too chaotic to invest in, or our intent to stand with one another to remedy what ails us all.
In this active eclipse window, we’re urged to make our choice, and make it wisely. Perhaps some of us will remember the secret: that we are spirit in a human shell, sharing a mortal experience with one another, and more powerful than we know. In a world filled with “Gods, godding,” whichever experience we decide for, we will have.