Curious about what the epic Uranus-Eris conjunction means for you? Intrigued by the dance of Neptune and Chiron in Pisces? In our exciting new class with Eric Francis, The Astrology of Now, your questions will receive thoughtful and insightful answers — and you’ll have lots of fun in the process. You may sign up here.
Today’s Oracle takes us to the Capricorn monthly for December 2012.
What is the message of the new Mayan era, to you personally? It’s a resounding cry for social justice, which can only be answered in the embodiment of leadership by example. It’s the only kind that works, whether intentional or not, and whether the example is of corruption, truth or love. Therefore, be conscious of the example you provide. Be conscious of the alignment of your words and of your actions. What you say, what you do and who you are has an impact on the world. You may not feel that way, yet. One thing that will help you notice your influence is to pause in trying to live up to what you think others would have you be. You do not need to be anything but who you are. In our particular world, the fact that this may not be acceptable to some people is evidence that you’re doing what is right, and popularity may be a sign that you’re wasting your time. Express your passion for justice by being just. Include people rather than exclude them. Make nobody conform to your point of view. Offer your empathy and consciously, vocally refrain from trying to control anyone — especially yourself.
The Daily Oracle offers a horoscope selected randomly by our Intelligent Archive Oracle program, unique to Planet Waves. It’s also a database of my horoscopes going back to the late 1990s. You can use the Intelligent Archive Oracle to answer questions and give you ideas for how to handle problems and situations you cannot see through. This feature is available to our Galaxy, Backstage and Core Community members. See this link for more information.
Now, about those walls, literal and metaphoric.
“The wish of the hungry to go where food is plentiful is what one would naturally expect from rational human beings; letting them act on their wishes is also what conscience would suggest is the right, moral thing to do. It is because of its undeniable rationality and ethical correctness that the rational and ethically conscious world feels so crestfallen in the face of the prospect of the mass migration of the poor and hungry; it is so difficult, without feeling guilty, to deny the poor and hungry their right to go where food is more plentiful; and it is virtually impossible to advance convincing rational arguments proving that their migration would be, for them, an unreasonable decision to take. The challenge is truly awesome: one needs to deny the other the selfsame right to freedom of movement which one eulogizes as the topmost achievement of the globalizing world and the warrant of its growing prosperity….” (p.76)
Bauman, Zygmunt (2000) Globalization: The Human Consequences
https://www.amazon.ca/Globalization-Human-Consequences-Zygmunt-Bauman/dp/023111429X
The UK referendum, USA primaries, and Continental European ‘confusion’… in one paragraph…sixteen years ago. No others, no rational ethical problem. Pass me a light…
No othering. I knew there was something.
No othering, no problem.
All different. All the same.
Caterpillars and butterflies.
“What choice do we have?”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/10/young-refugees-migrants-children-dubs-home-office-dubs