Author Archives: Fe Bongolan

About Fe Bongolan

Planet Waves writer Fe Bongolan lives in Oakland, California. Her column, "Fe-911," has been featured on Planet Waves since 2008. As an actor and dramaturge, Fe is a core member of Cultural Odyssey's "The Medea Project -- Theater for Incarcerated Women," producing work that empowers the voices of all women in trouble, from ex-offenders, women with HIV-AIDS, to young girls and women at risk. A Planet Waves fan from almost the beginning of Eric's astrology career, Fe is a public sector employee who describes herself as a "mystical public servant." When it comes to art, culture and politics, she loves reading between the lines.

Taking It Down

Planet Waves is running a membership drive.
Read more in Solstice Fire and the Art of Service, by Eric Francis.

 

I had originally planned to write on one of our domestic news stories here in he states: the taking down of the Confederate flag as a symbol, and its historic importance. Thus the title of the article. But watching the riveting reports on Greece’s ongoing economic situation, I was compelled to keep the title. For better or worse, it still applies.

I normally like to keep topics diverse with each Fe-911 column, but in the instance of Greece’s economic predicament and its ramifications not only in Europe but globally, I beg your indulgence as I try to remain focused.

We are all so connected in this world through our technology and, for better or worse, our economies. Keeping up on the news of the negotiations as EU nations come to grips with Greece’s bailout plan has been painful, as if we’re watching a slow-motion economic train wreck — and the varying degrees to avert it — in progress.

Yesterday, Paul Krugman’s op-ed in The New York Times summed it up:

But still, let’s be clear: what we’ve learned these past couple of weeks is that being a member of the eurozone means that the creditors can destroy your economy if you step out of line. This has no bearing at all on the underlying economics of austerity. It’s as true as ever that imposing harsh austerity without debt relief is a doomed policy no matter how willing the country is to accept suffering. And this in turn means that even a complete Greek capitulation would be a dead end.

In his editorial, Mr. Krugman pointed to the #ThisIsaCoup hashtag, popular this weekend on Twitter, Facebook and across the Web.

It came as a reaction to German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schauble’s response to the Greek bailout package worked out with the help of France and Italy, and proposed last Thursday. Schauble’s reply was that the terms of their new bailout wasn’t enough, and that Greece should sell its ports to the Luxembourg Institution for Growth, a subsidiary of the German KfW Bank where Schauble has a seat as Chairman on its Board of Directors.

A port is one of the mainstays of a stable economy for any city or country, ancient or modern. It is a basic foundation upon which you build a city or country. Selling off a port is tantamount to a country cutting off its legs.

Fortunately, after 17 hours of sometimes contentious negotiations, at least that part of the deal was taken off the table. But further austerity measures remain part of the new deal, and Greece may have to sell its electrical utilities to a private entity. As reported by the BBC, these terms are somewhat worse than the one Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras’ government refused earlier this spring.

What remains now is that Tsipras has to bring this proposed solution back to his Parliament for a vote. Some members of his own Syriza party are against further cuts to pensions and increased taxes. Which means that the one thing the European Commission does not want to happen and tried to avoid with their prolonged negotiations — ‘Grexit’ (‘Greek’ + ‘exit’) — may still come into play.

There are still more critical days ahead, and as Eric has written today about the New Moon in Cancer square Eris on Wednesday — by which time Greece’s Parliament will have voted on the deal — these days should prove quite interesting.

Should Parliament vote “yes” to the new bailout agreement, there remains a strong likelihood that Greece could still buckle under its conditions. If they vote “no” and a Grexit ensues, the EU as currently comprised could collapse. Either will have a ripple effect on our own economy.

Whatever happens when Parliament takes up the vote, the shifts could be geopolitical. It could be a taking down, but of who: Greece or the EC? We have yet to see. Let us focus our intent that the results of proceedings these next few days are the best for everyone involved.

Because news information comes from sources with agendas that are mixed, and sometimes suspect, I invite all our Planet Waves members from across the globe to chime in to help us flesh out this story and bring other perspectives. Flawed or correct, this is just my American view, skewed slightly left. Looking forward to meeting you below in the comments.

*******

Stay with Planet Waves as we move through these historical events in this fascinating moment in time. Here, we keep our fingers on the pulse of current events and keep digging deeper for ways to absorb and understand what’s happening in our world. It’s one of the core ways we practice the Art of Service. We work to inspire all our readers to actively create a positive effect on their individual and collective worlds.

I hope with this and all our great writing here that you not only stay tuned, but stay connected — actively participating — through one of our simple and affordable Core Community Pass memberships.

Joining us will give you access to more information and better tools to not only cope but play in the key of life. It’s worth it! — Fe

Demokratia

Planet Waves is running a membership drive.
Read more in Solstice Fire and the Art of Service, by Eric Francis.

 

Last week, Greece’s Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras did the one thing that Angela Merkel and the EU feared: schedule a national referendum for the country to decide whether or not Greece should accept the bailout conditions proposed jointly by the European Commission (EC) the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Central Bank (ECB) — also known as the Troika.

Terms of the new bailout would have meant more austerity measures — higher taxes, more pay cuts and pensions held. The cash the EU promised to keep Greece afloat would have essentially crushed the country.

In other words, more of the same for Greece, only worse. As a result of Tsipras’ referendum on Sunday, 61% of the country voted “OXI” (pronounced oki), or “no,” to the proposed austerity package.

The Prime Minister and his Syriza Party, which came into power less than six months ago, encouraged the country not only to reject the Troika’s austerity package, but to use yesterday’s national mandate as leverage to re-enter negotiations with the EU to ease Greece’s debt burden, and soften the EU’s loan terms until the country can recover. Imagine that, using his country’s permission to decide whether or not they want to be financially enslaved for decades.

The referendum’s results have placed Greece on the edge of an uncertain future. Days after defaulting on a €1.6 billion loan payment to the IMF, Greece was at the brink. Upon default of the loan repayment, the ECB refused to put more cash into Greek banks, forcing the Greek government to limit ATM withdrawals to $40 a day per citizen; this forced Greece to close its banks the week before the referendum. The country was in an economic tailspin within days of Sunday’s vote.

As a result of yesterday’s vote, Greece has been threatened with expulsion from the European Union, which is something the majority of Greeks do not want. Yet, for a country that has borne three years of crushing austerity under the Troika’s terms, they had nothing left to lose. By voting ‘no’ they opened themselves to choosing a fate to be determined.

Austerity measures were imposed on Greece in 2011 to recover billions borrowed from the IMF when they first joined the EU in 2001. Through various shady deals amongst corrupt Greek government officials and certain members of the Greek 1%, that debt was never repaid. Greece was already in deep trouble in 2010-11, around the time the IMF had troubles of its own, which I wrote about here at Planet Waves.

Instead of helping, the EC’s new 2011 austerity program further crippled a country deeply in trouble. The new austerity precipitated economic conditions much worse: higher taxes, a 26% unemployment rate nationwide and the cost of pensions rising. There were not enough younger people employed to pay into the pension fund. Greece’s unemployment rate for its young adults rose to a whopping 60%.

Greece could not produce enough money to pay down its massive debt. Its economic conditions mirror our own recent past. Prior to our troubles brewing under the surface in 2007-08, the sub-prime lending industry was profiting from wild speculation on bad housing loans. People lost their shirts paying escalating interest rates on variable rate mortgages with ballooning debt payments causing the loss of homes and life savings. This ultimately lead to the economic collapse of September 2008, when Lehman Brothers — among other “too big to fail” predatory banks that made money off of derivatives deals capitalizing on bad home loans — crashed and burned.

The Greek referendum reveals a painful truth about the EU — as a union of economically disparate countries with a shared economy, it is not yet in a position to work — not with a grouping of countries of such varied industrial profiles and economic straits. Take a moment to watch this Vox video posted by Ezra Klein, which explains the problems of the EU constituency in a quick three minutes.

The difference between the U.S. collapse in 2008 and Greece’s situation with the EU is that ours was in-house. The U.S. is a union of states with various levels of economy under one country. The EU is several countries under one economic union. The U.S. has the ability to support its struggling states through a federal system of taxes, government programs and short-term stimulus packages employed across the board, with economic mobility that allows us to move to better opportunities across the country should we choose.

Greece’s economic pressures were imposed by the EU countries that have more robust economies — namely Germany. The more robust EU nations hold Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain (or PIGS) to impossibly high standards: costs are too dear to sustain, and there is no way for the people of those countries to emigrate to better opportunities across their union. Greece’s rejection of the Troika’s terms awakens the EU’s worst fear–Grexit; it has been called a contagion that would could spread to other PIGS nations. As if any country daring to declare independence from debt is a dreadful disease.

Ever since Tsipras was elected in January 2015 on his leftist Syriza party’s anti-austerity platform, the EU has been on high alert. Some Syriza party members called the Troika’s economic pressure on Greece’s new leftist government a tactic to initiate regime change. It was not about the economy. It was about control.

Earlier this year, in a Der Spiegel concern-trolling article on the success of the Syriza Party and Tsipras’ election, an average Greek citizen had this to say about their new leftist leader in the article’s comments section:

It was a tough choice voting for Alexis. I knew I really should have had more consideration for you Germans and voted more responsibly. The choice was 5 more years of the kids begging in the streets if we voted New Democracy or, with Syriza, possibly seeing them back in school again, and even my wife and I getting our old jobs back. I can understand why so many thought we would stick with the austerity that we knew! We know it is highly irresponsible for us both to want to have jobs, and pay the rent and maybe see our local hospital re-open. But that is the Greeks for you! Always choosing the selfish option!

We see it in the crowds that are thronging to Bernie Sanders’ campaign events in the U.S. Nerves are being hit in high offices and on Main Streets. People have had enough of rules imposed by an invisible oligarchy and the governments they own. We don’t have to buy into fear-inducing threats, and we certainly don’t need to cower before bullies.

We don’t believe the news, which hardly ever covers Sanders’ candidacy with any seriousness. The people have one, daring move to make: expressing their free will through a full democratic process. Greece’s “OXI,” or “No,” was the right thing for them to do.

Demokratia — the political process of rule by the people that the Greeks invented over 2000 years ago, was perfected this week through the will of the people responding to economic oppression.

Today, we are reminded of Winston Churchill’s words when he said, “Homer, today the Greeks did not fight like heroes, the heroes fought like Greeks.” Take this to heart. This will be very useful in the days ahead. Remember it. Remember it well.

*******

Stay with Planet Waves as we move through these historical events in this fascinating moment in time. Here, we keep our fingers on the pulse of current events and keep digging deeper for ways to absorb and understand what’s happening in our world. It’s one of the core ways we practice the Art of Service. We work to inspire all our readers to actively create a positive effect on their individual and collective worlds.

I hope with this and all our great writing here that you not only stay tuned, but stay connected — actively participating — through one of our simple and affordable Core Community Pass memberships.

Joining us will give you access to more information and better tools to not only cope but play in the key of life. It’s worth it! — Fe

For Posterity’s Sake

Planet Waves is running a membership drive.
Read more in Solstice Fire and the Art of Service, by Eric Francis.

 

If you told me seven years ago I would be enjoying my morning tea with gay marriage sanctioned nationally, a George W. Bush-appointed Supreme Court Justice preserving affordable health care, an American President singing in a black church, and a multi-ethnic group of local citizens taking down the Confederate flag in The Capitol in South Carolina, I would have told you to take a hike.

But this is not a typical Monday in America. After last week, it looks like anything is possible.

On Thursday, even with more than 50 congressional votes to repeal it, the Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA) — aka Obamacare — is still alive and well in the US. Last week, it survived its toughest test, the Supreme Court case of King v. Burwell which, had it been successful, would have denied state subsidies. This would have hobbled and ultimately ended the ACA in 34 states.

Instead, the court broadly interpreted the ACA as it was intended — to provide health care coverage in every state with subsidies, insuring availability of ACA coverage to eight million Americans impacted by this case.

On Friday, June 26, the court ruled same-sex couples can marry across the country. By ruling in favor of the plaintiffs in Obergefell, et al., v. Hodges (naming Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky for their failure to recognize or perform same-sex marriages), the Supreme Court obviated the need for gay marriage to be approved on a state-by-state basis in one fell swoop. That long road is done.

Later that Friday, June 26, we watched President Barack Obama give his eulogy for state senator Clementa Pinckney at the Emanuel AME Church in Charleston. Drawing upon the hymn “Amazing Grace” — written by an English sea captain upon abandoning his career of transporting Africans into slavery in America — the President defined the sending of a Dylann Roof to the church as the grace of God, laying the groundwork for incredible acts of forgiveness by the families of Roof’s nine victims.

It was grace, Obama said, moving the groundswell of support for reconsidering flying the Confederate flag throughout the South, and grace for the solidarity of Charleston’s black and white communities banding together in the face of the terrible tragedy at Emanuel Church. It was in this eulogy that the President addressed the citizens of Charleston and the country on the racially-based social and economic inequities in America; the victims of gun violence at Sandy Hook and in Aurora, Colorado; and the brutality of police treatment of African Americans in cities across the country.

As an aftershock the next day, after refusing to wait for the state legislature to “discuss” the matter of taking down the Confederate flag as promised by South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, a multi-racial group of community members led by Brittany “Bree” Newsome went to the Capitol and took it down themselves.

It’s not a bad day to be witnessing history in America. Especially when you remember that forty years ago being gay was a shameful secret, that the Confederate flag was hoisted on the South Carolina state Capitol building in 1965, and access to quality health care without going bankrupt was impossible, especially if you had a pre-existing condition.

I would imagine that, in the space of just 48 hours — with such a confluence of energetic and progressive change upon the country — the President and the Chief Justice might feel something more than the summer breeze lifting them to awareness of their moment and place in time last week. Something had to move, and events set in motion years before moved current history forward again.

President Obama prevailed over one of the toughest challenges to his signature legislation. He was also on the right side of history in ending ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’, and refused to further defend the Defense of Marriage Act. This laid the groundwork for Obergefell, et al., v. Hodges to succeed in court.

Chief Justice Roberts upheld the Affordable Care Act in 2012 in the Court’s case of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. That verdict tenuously enshrined Obamacare into law and history under a slew of court challenges. It appeared last Thursday that in the King v. Burwell ruling he weighed his place in history as well, at the risk of eight million American lives denied healthcare. Friday, he bowed to the majority when the momentum showed the country was clearly in support of gay marriage.

Both men heard the call to be remembered for what they did when the moment presented itself.

Now, no one is perfect, especially leaders. President Obama’s legacy will still need to be weighed in light of the passage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement as well as his foreign policy, which is mired in endless engagement in the Middle East. John Roberts has his work cut out for him, especially with his corporatist leanings after ruling in favor of the Citizen’s United case.

Both men have much work to do. But so do we in response to them. We still need to carry on the fight for economic and social equity in this country. Women’s dominion over their own bodies remains a question mark when it should be a given. The dithering over climate change in Congress is essentially playing Nero’s violin while Rome burns. The militarization of police needs to be stopped, and all gun violence must cease.

For posterity’s sake, we all still have responsibility to do our part, shaking the ground beneath the men who have the gavels and the bully pulpit of the Presidency. Because that is what it takes to move mountains. For all of us, each and every moment, every act, every decision lays down a marker in the stream of time. For posterity’s sake, we need to get off our own posteriors and get back to work, because the real work of history continues to be with us.

Stay with Planet Waves as we move through these historical events in this fascinating moment in time. Here, we keep our fingers on the pulse of current events and keep digging deeper for ways to absorb and understand what’s happening in our world. It’s one of the core ways we practice the Art of Service. We work to inspire all our readers to actively creative a positive effect on their individual and collective worlds.

I hope with this and all our great writing here that you not only stay tuned, but stay connected — actively participating — through one of our simple and affordable Core Community Pass memberships.

Joining us will give you access to more information and better tools to not only cope but play in the key of life. It’s worth it! — Fe

Anyone But Me

Dear reader, a quick note before you dive into the column below: As a writer for Planet Waves, and a fighter for social justice on the page and the stage, my heart and soul is put into making sure each column is my very best work. Consider Fe-911 a gift from my heart to yours, with the intent of building a community of loving minds in response to today’s challenges. And there will be more challenges in the future. Get ready for them. I’m inviting you to come join us at Planet Waves by becoming a member in our family through one of these three membership options:

A 12-month Core Community Pass membership, on a sliding scale

A 6-month Core Community Pass membership, on a sliding scale

A regular-price Core Community Pass membership, through recurring monthly billing

Thank you for considering joining,
— Fe Bongolan

*******

We know this now more than ever. We live not in isolated pockets of prejudice, but with a collection of privileges that depend on each other for their persistence and resonance. — from The Conversation

After Charleston, I found myself unable to write. It hurts me to the heart that I still have to write this. And write about it and write about it. Some days it feels as though there aren’t enough letters on a page to cut through the dark matter that is trying hard to make its way back to the forefront of our national consciousness. But it’s here again.

White American racism is quite real, alive and well. It is not an antiquated concept we can dust off carefully with the brushes used in archeological digs, as if carefully tending to a past culture making its way into a museum of history.

This racism has been closely held, like a family secret. It is real, alive and in the moment. It is not in every white person in this country, but in enough people to make its presence all too clear; to make it clear that we need to dig deep to rid ourselves of it.

It is in the minds and hearts of the family and community that created and nurtured a Dylann Roof. It is in South Carolina’s laws prohibiting the desecration of the Confederate flag. That flag still flies proudly at the top of South Carolina’s capitol building flagpole, padlocked to prevent its removal, even as the state and American flags fly at half-mast commemorating the nine killed at Emanuel AME Church.

It is in the minds of Republican leadership in Congress, with Nixon’s Southern Strategy so far up their ass that they are animated by it, mouthing its words and writing its principles into policy like useful hand puppets. It is a guiding principle of FOX News.

It is in the split screen of a policeman holding a young black teenage girl prone on a lawn in McKinley, Texas, contrasted with Dylann Roof led to the police station wearing a bullet-proof vest. It is in the the inequality of choices and life chances based along racial and economic lines, triggering situations such as this.

It is a national crisis. It flares up during times of economic distress — lack of jobs, sluggish economies — that lead exactly to this moment in time. African Americans, immigrants, Muslims — already demonized — are further targeted by frustrated lower-class and socially impotent whites, ‘necessary’ victims upon whom to vent frustration with far too much aggression. It is in the isolation where Dylann Roof was allowed time to let his rage fester and take hold, creating his manifesto made up of lies — and there was no one there to check him on his tragically myopic, racist and ignorant beliefs about his fellow human beings.

But it isn’t just Dylann. It’s in the entire road this country has been on from family, to community, to the top echelons of power, including and especially the corporate masters who have purchased government. Each and every one let Dylann Roof go unchecked in thought and deed. He was sanctioned.

As if, as Rick Perry suggested, it was an isolated incident by an apparently disturbed young man who was probably on some kind of pharmaceutical drug that drove him to it. As if, as Rick Santorum said, this was an attack on Christianity because it happened in a church. These are delusions that only prolonged states of denial can produce.

Inch by inch, denial by denial, we have been traveling to that day in Charleston for a long time. It’s been a slow-moving train engineered by people in leadership, none of whom even bothered to remember that there was a Civil Rights Movement in this country 50 years ago, but word for dog-whistle word, dropped all civil discourse when we elected our country’s first black President. They declared racism over when clearly it is not.

Tickets to this ride we’re on have been sold by the entire FOX News network, The Wall Street Journal, Rush Limbaugh, Stormfront, and all the members of the extreme right-wing conservative media that allow these thoughts and feelings by people like Roof to find a home and flourish.

They make fortunes triggering white rage against the Other. They continue re-creation of white Christians as victims, besieged by the swirling hordes of dark barbarians at their gates, ready to take their jobs, rape their women, allow sex education in the schools and threaten the sanctity of their heterosexual marriages. It would be marvelous satire if it wasn’t for the ignorance that spawned these ideas.

It seems, at least in the news that no one sees or wants to acknowledge, to be their role in the history leading up to the tragedy at Emanuel AME Church. The deflection — stating anything that does not own up to the infrastructure of racism that runs deep in this country — is saying, “anyone but me had a hand in this.” But they all did. Anyone refusing to acknowledge racism in the media gave Dylann Roof the room to enter long before he walked into the church, with the National Rifle Association giving him a gun to enter with.

Yet this is where the deep work has to begin, and not just at meeting halls and Facebook or Twitter feeds, but at the dinner table, the PTA, and soccer games as well as in the halls of power. Though we may not believe ourselves racist, we may know others who are. We may harbor unkind and untrue thoughts about each other. What else can we do to get us past this darkness?

When South Carolina first raised the Confederate flag in 2000, world-renowned choreographer Bill T. Jones joined the NAACP’s protest, boycotting the Spoleto festival there, canceling his company’s two-day schedule of performances. Perhaps a state economic boycott is in order, only this time, we don’t boycott the opposition to gay wedding cakes but instead actively protest against a symbol that represents so much death and oppression for millions of Americans for over four centuries.

In response to the shootings, President Obama said the Confederate flag flying over South Carolina’s state capitol building should be placed in a museum. I disagree. Before that flag — a symbol of a time we should be long past — is commemorated in a museum where school children are brought to learn about their nation’s history, we need to give that part of our history and its symbolism its due.

South Carolina senator Lindsay Graham says of the Confederate flag that, “It’s who we are.”  If that’s the case, we need to discourage anyone who dares use it to hurt, terrorize and dehumanize our brothers and sisters from ever using it again. It’s a symbol of our history we should remember as a stain that we need to take responsibility for here and now. We need to provide that flag — the one Dylann Roof clung to in his Facebook page — a resting place in a physical state to remain in forever: Burned to ashes and stored carefully in a plexiglass box.

Meet you down below in the comments.

An Inconvenient Pope

There’s a profound level of relief I feel writing these words: I was wrong. Following Pope Benedict’s resignation in February 2013, the Papacy was an easy target. I was wrong when, in the aftermath of Pope Francis’ election as Pope, I came down hard on both the Church and its Papacy.

Scandal swirled in a constant news feed on the decades-long Vatican involvement protecting priests who had sexually abused children. The lawsuits are still ongoing diocese to diocese, and these charges come from across the globe. I came down hard on the new Pope for not only the Catholic Church’s criminal complicity of silence on the acts of its priests, but the Church’s centuries-long role in the oppression of women — from denying them priesthood to its current, rigid stand on female reproductive freedom.

But with over two years under his Papal chasuble, Pope Francis the First is forcing me to re-think and refine my hard line against the Vatican.

Like the American Presidency, the Papacy carries with it the weight of history’s bloodiest baggage. These powerful offices have networks so vast and capable of such great cruelty that they far exceed the individual goodness of the men who hold the position. And these institutions are both hard, if not impossible, to change overnight.

Pope Francis’ Papacy is attempting to gain footing in a fast-changing world, while managing a vast group of Catholics, from the most radical to the most staunchly conservative in his flock. There is still much work for the Church to get the hell out of the culture wars plaguing us, including birth control, in which the Church still plays antagonist. But even early on Francis’ Papacy, the signs have been encouraging that it’s coming to grips with the real issues, as described in this Huffington Post article from 2014:

Still, the idea that the Vatican in some forum, even an advisory one, is pondering the question of planetary limits is, to put it mildly, encouraging. If the Catholic Church, under the leadership of Pope Francis, takes the view that we are stewards of God’s earth and that we have a responsibility to maintain this planet for future generations, it is not a big leap to conclude that couples should consider having smaller families. And from there it is not a huge leap to conclude that women should have access to modern methods of birth control in planning their families.

Pope Francis is facing the world, embracing his role as a moral compass and peacemaker. A good priest in the role of lightening rod, he’s had a good start: speaking critically on global income inequality; and brokering the conversations that led to the warming of U.S.-Cuba relations. The Pope’s position on climate change is having an impact on American politics.

Using his pulpit to stand for people in nations most vulnerable to the drastic climate changes experienced this last decade, he gives moral weight to the argument that has, up to now, only been the realm of scientists and skeptics. The Pope will address the United Nations later this year on the subject. That alone is causing agita amongst conservative Catholics and their banner man, the anti-gay, pro-life Republican Rick Santorum — who is running for President in 2016.

If an international majority of scientists and their solid evidence cannot penetrate the boneheaded anti-science stupidity of people trying to re-write laws and gut environmental protection for profit, perhaps a man of God in one of the most visible offices in the world pleading for the sake of humanity could.

The Papacy is the pulpit Francis uses as the iconic standard for Christian morality. That makes his positions on income inequality and climate change all the more difficult and dangerous for those who have the most to gain from both. I credit this to the Pope’s Sagittarian nature and years of practice in liberation theology in Latin America, a continent that has had more than its share of greedy despots and tyrants, most of whom were put into position by the U.S.

Even as the U.S. is struggling to maintain a secular government in the face of its Christian conservative majority in Congress, and although the Pope may not be in the best position yet to influence U.S. politicians and the money behind them, his reach is far deeper than our politics. He hits home with the millions of Catholics around the world.

That is why, at this moment in time, and borrowing from the title of Al Gore’s documentary An Inconvenient Truth, Pope Francis is a most inconvenient man. The opinions expressed by God’s priest on earth are dangerous to the status quo killing the planet.

So if I judged Pope Francis I too harshly, I take it back. For as much as I have to argue with the Church on their various stands in the culture wars that divide us, I feel good saying I was wrong in doubting this man’s largeness of thought. It seems to be having an effect. His words and his actions are not inconvenient. They are coming at just the right time.

No Surprise

We’ve all been experiencing one hell of a Mercury retrograde. As Mercury approaches station Thursday and lurches into forward movement later on this week, it seems as though even an international multimillion-dollar sports league — Federation Internationale de Football Association (or FIFA, for short) — is not big enough to be immune to this retrograde.

This week’s scandale du jour isn’t the familial pedophilia of the Duggars or the skeleton in the closet of former US House Speaker Dennis Hastert. Fourteen of FIFA’s top officials were arrested on charges of corruption by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

RICO is a federal law designed specifically to target organized crime, allowing leaders of a syndicate to be tried for crimes they ordered others to do, or assisted others in doing. Originally designed to prosecute the Mafia, the laws have expanded to include others involved in continual patterns of criminal activity and corruption.

The charges against FIFA are vast. For years, 14 of FIFA’s high-ranking officials pocketed over $150 million in bribes and kickbacks through every phase of the organization’s activities: vote-getting for the cities vying for the right to host the World Cup; exclusive media and marketing rights for the games; development and infrastructure planning of stadiums; even the actual games themselves. Unfortunately, the damage doesn’t end there.

The host countries, particularly in parts of the developing world, sacrificed public dollars they couldn’t afford to build stadiums that are unsustainable economically and environmentally. Jeremy Stahl, soccer blogger for Slate wrote:

In South Africa, hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on white elephant stadiums that have rarely been used following the 2010 World Cup in a country where more than half of its children were living in poverty as of 2012. Multiple local officials in that country were reported to have been murdered, allegedly for whistle-blowing or other involvement in stadium fraud.

In Brazil, a $300 million, 40,000-plus seat stadium was built in the middle of the Amazon rainforest where potential post-Cup audiences of that size just don’t exist. That’s probably one reason why a majority of Brazilians opposed hosting this World Cup, saying the more than $11 billion price tag could be better spent on public services.

In Qatar, (the site of the 2022 World Cup) meanwhile, on top of the bribery claims, hundreds of migrant workers have died working on infrastructure and constructions projects since the country was awarded the tournament and 4,000 (or nearly 600 workers per year) are projected to die by 2022 at the current rate.

Sports journalists and broadcasters have been joking about FIFA’s under-reported corruption for years. FIFA corruption was an insider’s joke until one reporter unearthed FIFA’s secrets in an expose published in 2006; that started the Justice Department’s investigation.

Re-elected to his fifth term as FIFA’s President just days after the mass arrest of FIFA’s 14, Sepp Blatter resigned to ease the organization’s “transition” during the US DOJ’s investigation. He currently does not face any charges, even though the man closest to Blatter was arrested. The bets are on whether Blatter will do a perp walk at all.

My hunch is that the 14 are taking the fall. At least for now. I speculate that there is a push to buy time as Blatter puts up enough of a legal wall to protect himself and others — perhaps even higher up than FIFA’s officials, who took part in FIFA’s global scams.

In the United States, our primary religion is NFL football. For the rest of the world, soccer is “the real football.” Like our football, it is a religion ingrained from childhood. Like any religion, soccer glorifies a powerful mix of sacraments: nationalism, machismo, grace, speed, skill and competition. Watching both the sport and the players, I can see why people call it “the beautiful game.”

FIFA is, as John Oliver says in his hilarious rant from 2014, a business that exploits a religion — the worship of soccer. FIFA’s infamous “14” took advantage of soccer’s globally fervent following to profit from the proceeds at almost every level, as if these cardinals of the beautiful game were untouchable because the sport is holy.

With these arrests, FIFA now joins distinguished ranks of other famous RICO collars: the Hell’s Angels, the Catholic dioceses for their part in the sex abuse cover up, and insider trader Michael Milken. From the look of things — the global scale of their activities, the costs in lives for countries that FIFA’s officials exploited, and the arrogance of it’s leadership — FIFA seems to be in well-deserved company. And for the millions across the world who still love this game, that should come as no surprise. Goooooooooooal!!

Old Ghosts Coming Back

This Mercury retrograde has yielded yet another scandal. The Washington Post reports that a federal grand jury has indicted former House Speaker Dennis Hastert on charges of breaking banking laws in a bid to pay $3.5 million in hush money to a young male student that he sexually molested while he worked as a wrestling coach at an Illinois high school.

From 2010 to 2014 Hastert, a highly paid and successful lobbyist for foreign countries at the lobbying firm of Dickson Shapiro, had made over 100 bank withdrawals of a little less than $10,000 each for a total of $950,000 paid to his victim.

Federal banking rules require you file a Currency Transaction Report for any withdrawal transaction over $10,000. This is a way to monitor criminal activity against your bank account. Hastert tried skirting around this requirement by breaking up his withdrawals into amounts that didn’t require reporting. This is known in the trade as “structured” transactions and is illegal. He subsequently went on to lie about it to the FBI when one of Hastert’s banks asked authorities to investigate his frequent withdrawals.

The timing of this news could not have been more poignant or compelling astrologically, coming in on the heels of Josh Duggar’s child sexual abuse scandal. Our current Mercury retrograde seems intent on digging up ghosts.

Neither Hastert’s money scandal or the sex scandal is new. But I can’t imagine what terrible weight it must have been holding onto this dark secret. Especially while leading a Republican congressional majority rising to power on Bill Clinton’s impeachment for lying about his sexual impropriety to Congress.

By holding onto the secret in his past, Hastert inadvertently brought down his own career as Speaker of the House, as well as the Republican stranglehold in Congress. Hastert — once thought to have the cleanest record, at least relatively, amongst party leadership — failed to act aggressively in the matter of Rep. Tom Foley of Florida. Foley was the congressman who attempted to molest and sexually harass young male pages working at the House of Representatives in 2005.

Recalling Hastert’s actions as Speaker during the time, Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo speculates: “Set aside whether this past had any role in Hastert’s office’s laggard response to warnings about Foley. Hastert was hiding an explosive secret. He must have been terrified of exposure. A thundering denunciation of Foley would seem like the kind of move which almost would have invited a past victim to step forward. Perhaps that explains his reticence. At this point there’s no way to know.”

Dennis Hastert will be arraigned in court soon. As a wealthy lobbyist with connections and influence in Washington, he has strings to pull to help him out of this. Though I think with this retrograde, things will get sticky for him for awhile. But this and the Duggars’ scandal last week makes me wonder what people are thinking when they can run for public office. Or for that matter what they’re thinking when offered their own television show on a cable network.

Old sins come back to bite. We know power and money still corrupt and continue to hold sway in politics and in life. We know that ghosts come back to haunt, like chickens come back home to roost. There is often a price to pay when a person, family or political party claiming moral superiority falls from grace. Here, today, is yet another story.

At Home With the American Taliban

Last week 27-year-old Josh Duggar, reality TV star of The Learning Channel’s “19 Kids and Counting,” resigned from his position in the Family Resource Council (FRC) — the top conservative Christian lobbying group in Washington DC — on the heels of a scandal.

It was revealed in a news story from InTouch magazine that in 2002 Josh, then 14 years old, sexually abused a number of young girls including his younger sisters. His parents did not report it to the authorities for over a year.

What followed shortly after the revelation and resignation was a public free-fall. With outcry mounting to cancel the show altogether, The Learning Channel has pulled “19 Kids and Counting” from its lineup. Up until that time, the network was playing re-runs of past episodes. The show has had eight seasons and the network and was preparing for its ninth.

For those of us unfamiliar with the Duggars, the TV show’s title says it all. It’s about an American family complete with a devoted husband, his wife and their 19 children. Josh’s parents Jim Bob and Michelle are devout evangelical Christians who obviously practice no family planning of any type, counting each pregnancy as God’s will. The Duggars take part in what is called the Quiverfull Movement.

Aside from a “Trust the Lord” methodology of family planning — equating birth control drugs and devices to abortion — Quiverfull values include patriarchy, courtship and betrothal as opposed to dating. Quiverfull advocates sheltering children from outside influences such as peers or public school. It promotes biblical manhood and womanhood, being debt-free and independent of government support, home church, and modesty for girls and women lest they become temptation for men.

Evangelical Christians aren’t the only ones taking part in the movement. Many fundamentalist religious groups who practice some form of home-schooling adhere to the Quiverfull movement’s values. The more years of acceptance and adherence to the values espoused by the Quiverfull movement, the more a normal family becomes a patriarchal cult of true believers.

The news story and Josh’s admission has done more than get his family’s TV show removed from cable television, at least for now. There are questions about Josh, the Duggars and the religious network of support that protected him and them. Why did Jim Bob and Michelle keep things under wraps for so long? Why wasn’t there effective psychological counseling when Josh’s behavior was first discovered? Why hadn’t we heard of the matter from Josh’s sisters?

The answers lie in the culture that the Duggars live in, which approves a conspiracy of silence. At the time of the incident, the Duggars sought private help for Josh, sending him to the Institute for Basic Life Principles (IBLP), which advocates Bible-based teachings to help families and individuals in crisis. According to the IBLP’s doctrine, the young women who Josh Duggar abused may have acted “immodestly,” tempting him away from his purity, and are thus partly responsible for his groping them. The Institute’s faith-based methodology counsels forgiveness of the abuser by the victims. According to the ideology of the IBLP, there are no victims in matters of abuse of any kind. It counsels that there should be no bitterness (therefore no recrimination or reporting) against the abuser.

With this type of perspective ingrained in the institute’s teaching, as well as in his own family’s values, it’s no wonder Josh Duggar does not see himself as having committed a crime, which is what sexually assaulting a minor is.

If it seems that I am only rehashing tabloid news you are free to stop reading right here. But the Family Research Council, of which the Duggars play a part, write the agenda for many members of Congress who make policies that control our lives and our choices. The purity culture promoted by the FRC, the IBLP and the Duggars’ reality show creates a culture of rape for women — who are, in their worldview, responsible for the violence perpetrated against them.

The saving grace of Josh Duggar’s public free-fall for the rest of us is that we get a glimpse into the mind of the American Taliban. Even though I find myself refraining from judging Josh for what he did in the past and even the society in which he was raised, that subculture has no compunction against continuing to judge and trying to control the rest of us.

They will not hesitate to impose their world view and morality onto the rest of us. In fact, they continue to do so each day through the utterances of politicians who use their words and ideas to forward laws governing what women can do with our bodies and who can marry. The very definition of Taliban is: “a fundamentalist (Islamic) militia in Afghanistan.” Change the religion and the country, and in modern-day America, it looks like the shoe fits.