One thought on “New Restrictions on Abortion Restrictions”
Judith Gayle
I’ve always thought that refusing to fund wood-meds (Viagra, etc.) with public money would take a little starch out of their shorts and make the point nicely, but — although we have more women than usual in Congress right now — it’s still a Mens Club, with several powerful women having announced their retirement this year. A bill restricting male sexuality wouldn’t even make it to the floor for discussion, and I’d bet they’d cry foul on their Constitutional right to “pursue happiness” (but for women, not so much Constitutional consideration, since they’re hatching new voters.)
I’ve always thought that refusing to fund wood-meds (Viagra, etc.) with public money would take a little starch out of their shorts and make the point nicely, but — although we have more women than usual in Congress right now — it’s still a Mens Club, with several powerful women having announced their retirement this year. A bill restricting male sexuality wouldn’t even make it to the floor for discussion, and I’d bet they’d cry foul on their Constitutional right to “pursue happiness” (but for women, not so much Constitutional consideration, since they’re hatching new voters.)