Category Archives: Columnist

Danielle Voirin’s Photo of the Day for 01.19.16

VQ-A

The written readings for Vision Quest, Planet Waves’ 2016 annual edition, have now been published. Order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.


Paris-based photographer Danielle Voirin travels the world and documents her experiences in photographs. She takes street photography and photojournalism a shade beyond even art, to the level of mysticism. You may see more of her work on her website DanielleVoirin.com, or her alt website, DaniVoirin.com.

Evening in the expressionism hall at the Musée d'Orsay in Paris.  On the left: the Tuileries Gardens and in the distance, the Sacre Coeur.  On the right: the Louvre.

Evening in the expressionism hall at the Musée d’Orsay in Paris. On the left: the Tuileries Gardens and in the distance, the Sacre Coeur. On the right: the Louvre.

Danielle Voirin’s Photo of the Day for 01.18.16

VQ-A

The written readings for Vision Quest, Planet Waves’ 2016 annual edition, have now been published. Order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.


Paris-based photographer Danielle Voirin travels the world and documents her experiences in photographs. She takes street photography and photojournalism a shade beyond even art, to the level of mysticism. You may see more of her work on her website DanielleVoirin.com, or her alt website, DaniVoirin.com.

We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now. - Martin Luther King Jr. and two llamas in Cincinnati.

We may have all come on different ships, but we’re in the same boat now. – Martin Luther King Jr. and two llamas in Cincinnati.

Weekend Tarot Reading — Sunday, Jan. 17, 2016

By Sarah Taylor

What if we were to make peace with our fathers?

It’s not a suggestion, but a question — one that this reading makes clear is up for consideration. I don’t believe an answer is required or even necessary; I don’t think this is about forcing hurtful or impossible terms. But asking the question? I think that’s the essence of the three cards in front of you today.

four_cups_king_wands_knight_wands_haindl_sm

Four of Cups, King of Wands, Prince of Wands from the Haindl Tarot deck, created by Hermann Haindl. Click on the image for a larger version.

Last week, the Ace of Cups sat at the centre of the reading, a symbol of the flow of Love that you either choose to resist or align with.

It’s not an active process, unless you see ‘letting go’ as something you do actively; I’m not sure that letting go is a primary action as much as it’s something that happens when it’s clear it is the only option that makes sense anymore. It is the result of a chain of actions and reactions that bring you to the point where letting go feels, if not logical, then inevitable.

The cards today continue this theme — and, really, an ongoing theme of change and stepping into a position of authority in your own life — in a specific form.

The version that I have of the Four of Cups has as its title “Mixed Happiness.” This has since been updated to “Yearning,” which has the effect of positioning the card as reaching into the future towards something that is yet to manifest, rather than leaving it held in the present. Hermann Haindl himself said that this card spoke of needing to do something with the Cups in order to effect the kind of change that transforms current circumstances — ones that may feel like loss or disillusionment, or pain and grief. This is similar to the Ace, where one must reach for it in order to own the gift of Love that it offers you.

I notice that the blue background in the Four of Cups mirrors the background in the third card, that of the Prince of Wands (the Knight in the Rider-Waite Smith deck). I also notice that the card in the centre, the King of Wands, acts as an interface of sorts between the Four and the Prince.

I am going to call the King the surface of the mirror. The Four of Cups — “Mixed Happiness” or “Yearning” — is what you, the Prince of Wands, is looking at when you look into this mirror.

Except this mirror is not neutral. No mirror in this world is, no matter how much we believe it to be. Mirrors reflect back to us an interpretation of what we’re looking at based on who we are and the experiences we bring to it. The surface of the mirror is a filter that is uniquely tinged by our beliefs — especially the hidden ones.

Here, you, dear Prince, are looking at a situation in your life through the eyes of your father, the King of Wands. You may not know it, but it is he who stands behind your shoulder, in some way influencing not only what you are looking at, but also the one who is doing the looking: you.

Why are you feeling the way you are about the yearning that runs through you? This force at play within: is it you? Or is it a filter that you have carried around — possibly unknowingly, probably for much of your life — that influences how you see, react and respond to your circumstances?

This, to me, is the striving for identity in circumstances that are defined by loss — and the moment, a gift, that is given to you in the stillness where you get to choose how and who you are when you finally respond. It is also about peace-making: with the inner fiery masculine, with the seat of creativity, with father, with an authority figure, with authority itself.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available, and Eric is working on the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or individual signs here.

The written readings for all 12 signs of Vision Quest are available for instant access, and Eric is working on the audio astrology and rune readings! Order all 12 signs here, or select individual signs here.

To create your life as a reaction against what you perceive as the shortcomings and failings of masculinity and how it was modelled to you is to have your life defined by it. You become the very thing that you repel. You search, search, search in the mirror for your answer, not thinking to turn around and see what it is that is really being reflected back to you.

And so, I come back to a variation of the question that started this reading: What if you were to make peace with your father?

What if you were able to see his influence, and the ways he unnervingly shows up in your thoughts, your words, your actions? What if you were to look as fully as possible, not because you needed to forgive him, but so you could set yourself free? What if he were to become human, rather than super- or inhuman? What if you were to see him as limited, rather than an infinite god?

What if you were to resurrect yourself as the person who is really standing in front of the mirror, and dance to your own tune — perhaps one that includes joy and sensuality, pleasure and beauty, and a more fluid and creative notion of masculinity? What if all of this resided in you alongside the ability to hold to yourself as a mature expression of centred creativity?

Maybe then your father wouldn’t command so much of your attention that you have little room for anything else. And maybe a whole lot more would change besides.

Astrology/Elemental correspondences: Four of Cups (Moon in Cancer), Father of Wands in the East (the fiery aspect of fire), Son of Wands in the East (the airy aspect of fire)

If you want to experiment with tarot cards and don’t have any, we provide a free tarot spread generator using the Celtic Wings spread, which is based on the traditional Celtic Cross spread. This article explains how to use the spread.

On Death, Gender, & the Orgasm as a Performance of Femininity

This week’s relationship-themed guest-post comes from Christina Louise Dietrich, whom we’ve featured a few times in the last year or so. She writes about her healing journey at her own blog. — Amanda P.

By Christina Louise Dietrich

I am now 44 years old. I am a mother and a head of household. I am past the age where people used to be generally considered “over the hill.” From a transition standpoint, this is significant for me personally because there’s only one generation remaining between me and mortality: the generation of my mother and her siblings. My next big generational shift will be to matriarch/crone. My mother’s will be to death.

Christina Louise Dietrich

Christina Louise Dietrich

My mother’s death isn’t imminent, but it is inevitable, and even though only in her early 60’s she has had a fair share of medical scares. Cancer. Stroke. Falls with broken bones. A choking incident that brought her dangerously close to asphyxiating if it hadn’t been for my stepfather finding and resuscitating her. All these events remind me of her mortality by keeping it in the peripheral vision of my mind’s eye. Watching. Waiting for each of us to advance another rung on the generational ladder.

On Day of the Dead, I set up an altar to the matriarchs in my family; I put my attention on my maternal great-grandmother, my maternal grandmother, and my mother. I’ve spent a lot of time in therapy the last four years talking about these women and the not-insignificant effects they had not only on me but each another. As an ancestral line, I can clearly see the traits handed down to me courtesy of them, some of which include strength, anxiety, determination, a high need for control, frugality, tenacity, and a deep sense of familial duty/sacrifice/obligation.

The altar is still intact and I continue to feel their presence, hear their voices. Even more strongly now than before—I think, because I’m calling out for their support and wisdom. Because I can feel myself beginning to prepare energetically and psychically for the death of my mother. Even if it’s only theoretical at this stage, as a planner who is finely attuned to transitions, doorways, and liminal spaces it’s a transformation that’s especially potent for me during this season of darkening.

What I’m feeling into right now is how the process of her dying will change the dynamic of our relatedness; how she will take on more child-like qualities and I will assume the more parental role. I see the possibility for me to support her more in the coming years; to take the skills I’ve learned through parenting Avery and re-parenting myself, and leveraging those to hold a more compassionate, patient space for her. After all, she has a high need for control just like I do and as she loses control over more of her self, I anticipate the need for a lot of patience on my end.

As if sitting with the impending death of my mother weren’t intense enough, it’s also bringing up older, deeper body memories for me. Because this isn’t the first time she and I have danced with power dynamics and leaned on one another for support.

Embodying the Masculine as a Girl Child

When I was 5 years old, my mother and I (and my 3-year-old sister) were in a pretty shitty situation. My sexually, physically, and emotionally abusive biological father had just left us for the last time because my mother stood up to him, and told him to get out and never come back. An act of strength and courage I have since thanked her for many times. An act that while freeing us from him, also left us in a position of needing to depend on one another more directly, more concretely.

Like many women who had been trapped by domestic abuse, she was literally at rock bottom; overwhelmed, exhausted, deeply wounded, and also needing to care for two small children. Even with the local support of her parents and brothers, it was still really hard at home. She needed me to be her “big girl,” to be strong and help her with baby Theresa when she got overwhelmed. She needed me to carry a lot more emotional and psychic weight than was appropriate given my age and equally vulnerable position.

I was naturally precocious in the ways of care-taking and helping; I was a sensitive, empathetic, deeply-feeling child from a long line of caretakers and emotional baggage handlers. And so, when my mother needed someone to be strong for her, someone she could count on to always be there and love her, I became a source of support, reliability, and certainty for her in a world that seemed bent on hurting her. She could talk to me, share her feelings, and cry about how much it hurt. She could count on me to be relatively independent, capable, and self reliant.

I believe that I embodied the masculine to protect her from falling deeper into dysfunction, to protect my primary source of security, safety, and love. And yet none of it could be acknowledged as such; it was an unconscious resonance between us. She wasn’t consciously awake enough to recognize what was happening and I was a little girl desperate to ensure Mommy wouldn’t abandon or stop loving me.

And so, in a sense, we became psychically married, she and I. Co-dependent. Enmeshed. Tied together because of the wounds the patriarchy and my father inflicted, and we jointly had to recover from. As a result, I have always felt responsible for her well-being; responsible to be a sturdy framework against which she could drape her tired, bruised limbs and cry.

Being Told to Put on the Girl Suit

At the same time, despite how masculine and grown-up I felt in the relationship with my mother, I was obviously in the body of a young girl. I knew I was a girl and I’ve never felt any confusion or disgust about that fact; it’s just that I’ve never been comfortable or confident in my ability to perform femininity. The world was telling me to put on the pink suit and its myriad complicated accouterments, but at home I was clearly wearing something that approximated the blue suit, at least in function. Thus began my internal dissonance around gender and society’s expectations in regard to it.

As a cis-female born in 1971 America and raised by a traditionally-valued family, I’ve been handed a lot of narrowly-defined programming about how I’m supposed to look, what I’m allowed to do, and how I should conduct myself. As an androgynous, 6-foot-tall, anxious, suspicious woman with an advanced case of “Resting Bitch Face,” I’ve had a damn hard time manifesting those programs in ways that convince people.

Aside from the fact I live in a rape culture as a second-class citizen—which means I’ve been raped, get paid less than my male co-workers, and still have a hard time getting people to take me seriously—living in a female body has been pretty cool. I actually like being a woman, especially now that I’m in my 40’s. What I find so distasteful is trying to embody and perform femininity. Lace. Mini skirts. High heels. Makeup. Push-up bras. Smooth legs. An hourglass hip-to-waist ratio. An inviting smile. A willingness to be told what to think.

I worked hard to adopt the mannerisms and affectations of Society’s Desirable Feminine, or at least someone whose appearance shouted I’M READY TO GET FUCKED, which is essentially the same thing. These attributes and the dogged pursuit of them are what I hate about the mainstream definition of culturally-acceptable femininity. Because every single one of them is about oppression. Getting smaller. More contained. More malleable. Hobbled. Agreeable. Compliant. Tortured. Objectified.

What about the Christina suit? It’s contains an entire spectrum of colors and would allow me fluid movement. Does anyone want to see me wearing it? No?

Finding my Authentic Orgasmic Rhythm

One of the things they don’t tell you straight-away about performing femininity is the fact it’s arbitrary, often conflicting, and designed to keep you off balance. Embarrassed. Competitive. Ashamed. Inadequate. Because horizontal violence and oppression. For example, let’s look at the female orgasm.

Over the last few months I’ve discovered that my body doesn’t want to climax every time Brendan and I have sex. She actually prefers to do so every 2-3 times; a rhythm that allows Her to be literally fed by both our combined sexual energy and His semen. She wants to hold that energy inside her and use it to fuel all manner of erotic undertakings like blogging, cooking, and remembering how amazing it is to live inside this beautiful body. To fuel the remembering that Her pleasure is worth building and worth waiting for.

I’m standing in the shower one morning, seeing the truth of this newly-discovered rhythm, and wondering why it feels so revolutionary. I asked my body, “Body, why do you feel so amazed, relieved, and empowered to have discovered this?” The answer came, “Because I’ve been expected to have an orgasm every time we have sex.” Oh. Why? Because that’s a crucial part of performing femininity. According to popular media/porn, we all “know” when a woman has an orgasm because she’s loud and makes a big deal out of it, yelling and flailing around because the pleasure is just so epic.

The pleasure that the man is generating with his amazing, big, fat cock. OBVIOUSLY. So, once she has been thoroughly pleasured, that’s his signal—the sign that he’s “done a good job,” that he’s “earned” his release. That he can now cum, secure in the fact his penis is desirable, he’s an amazing lover, and he is worthy of further love and attention. His ego is intact. For the time being.

As the woman, what if I can’t or don’t want to have an orgasm? Well, now I’m coming dangerously close to bruising, crushing, or invalidating his ego and suffering the consequences. Because there will certainly be consequences and I’m the one who gets to clean up the emotional/psychological fallout. In this construct, preserving/protecting the male ego is MY responsibility and ensuring that ego feels secure all hinges on my ability to perform a convincing orgasm. Every time. Or else.

That’s a lot of pressure and my body has decades of it tamped down inside. Like I said, I’ve never been confident in my ability to perform femininity convincingly enough to ensure my safety.

Fortunately for me, I now have a partner whose aware of all that programming; both sides of it. He knows exactly what it’s like to have a fragile masculine ego that depends on near-constant feminine reassurance for its survival. And because he’s also committed to deep, bilateral healing in our relationship, he has given me a lot of space, time, and reassurance to find my rhythm. He doesn’t ask me to perform feminine sexuality for him unless I choose to do so. He wants to see pure, unadulterated, androgynous Christina and to discover what kind of sex SHE wants. What a fucking relief!

Loving Her as Loving Myself

So, my mother is going to die and with her will go the physical connection that my masculine has to her. How do I want to experience her in the time we have left? Over the years I have shared with her some of my childhood experience; how I’ve felt wounded by her inadequacies, how I’ve felt oppressed by and responsible for her pain, how it felt to be her daughter. Those were anxious, gut-churning encounters for me because holding up a mirror so my mother can see how she inadvertently wounded me took a lot of courage for me to do and for her to look.

It also hurt her. Because she knows she wasn’t the mother we both needed her to be. She couldn’t be. This world ensured she was broken by the time I came into her life. And I no longer feel the need to punish her for that, to try and get her to take responsibility for all the ways she let me down. For the ways she leaned on, squished, and controlled me. If she had the skill to be more respectful, validating, and supportive she would have been. I believe that with all that I am.

I’m a mother; I know how hard it is. And because we both know, it feels like I can now begin the final stages of individuating from her and claim my full identity. Every time I share space with her, feel her love for me, and feel my love for her, I can also step away from her with compassion, with respect. I can complete the process that allows me to transition past, through and with her.



Christina Louise Dietrich, a technical writer by trade, says of herself: “I write because I am claiming the voice my family and my society tried to silence, the voice that was my divine birthright. I am a woman, a mother, a feminist, a wife. I am compassionate, judgmental, loving, a bully, empathetic, obstinate, caring, rigid, and creative. I’m passionate about systems, beauty, process, experience, trees, interconnections, transitions, logistics, balance, and clarity. I manifest the Amazon, the Androgyne, and the Mother-to-be-Crone.”

Regarding The Unthinkable

Vision Quest, Planet Waves' 2016 annual edition, is fast approaching publication. Pre-order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.

Vision Quest, Planet Waves’ 2016 annual edition, is fast approaching publication. Order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.


By Judith Gayle | Political Waves

With an interesting week behind us, including more than half of the current Mercury retrograde, our first re-think project of the year is going swimmingly. That’s not to say it isn’t painful in some measure. Looking backwards to see where we’ve been always stirs the mix in the memory jar. You know, lost loves and missed opportunities, things left undone and hopes unfulfilled come to mind. Or days better than these, now behind us, the thought of which carries its own signature of sorrow. Staying in the present moment is an art.

275+Judith_Gayle

Time slows a bit in a Merc retro, which is a boon these days when the clock seems so tightly wound that the hours race ahead faster than we can fill them. We get some breathing room with retros, which allows for thoughtful assessment. Had to laugh — ruefully — at a ledeline over at Raw Story this week: “Sean Penn interviews El Chapo and suddenly journalists care about ethics.” That’s how hindsight works when it’s successful. Hypocrisy noted, and hopefully integrated into the larger picture.

​Crisis du jour, the Iranian hostage​ situation lasted about a minute and a half, long enough for the right-wing to lick its lips in anticipation of some ass-kicking — theirs, not ours. “Morning Joe” Scarborough evidently felt the tingle in his nether-regions too, prompting him to announce “Hey, Iran, you have exactly 300 days left to push a U.S. president around, enjoy it while you can. After that, there will be hell to pay.”

Obama evidently didn’t feel too pushed, not even mentioning the event in his State of the Union, so let’s affirm that Joe’s wrong on both counts. Let warmongers everywhere note that diplomacy, and the pending lift of financial sanctions, won the day and the American sailors — who eventually admitted ‘navigational problems’ as opposed to faulty engines that caused inappropriate drift into Iranian waters — were released. As good an excuse as any, I suppose, and although the conservatives swallowed their tongues in apoplexy, the video of apology from one detained American sailor seemed not just justified but appropriate.

Following Obama’s hopeful SOTU — looking back at his tenure​, and forward to an America in league with her better angels — the Republican debate was, as described by one writer this morning, a “schlong contest.” Credit Trump for cheapening the rhetoric. It was Donald versus Ted trading insults this time around, with Jeb attempting to jab from a position so weak, people are wondering why he doesn’t just pull the plug.

From his tone, Jeb appears to have acquiesced to defeat, saying that he misjudged the intensity of anger among Republican voters. Add that he “believes the country in 2016 is ‘dramatically different’ than in past elections,” and there you have the perfect establishment candidate, clueless to the powerful zeitgeist goading the nation. Add Mrs. Clinton to that description, ​feverish to break the mold her decades of political triangulation have earned her ​ without getting too far from the middle.

Rubio stood by as the ‘reasonable’ third place candidate, making points only when he went after Hillary, which they all did at some point. It’s spectacular how much they hate/fear her. No stranger to caustic movies and their historical ramifications, Hillary must quietly stew now that there is a new one, released today, designed to bring as much instability to her platform as fracking has to the Oklahoma countryside.

The Benghazi biopic, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, comes just two weeks before the Iowa caucus. Poorly reviewed, the movie is being sold as non-political, with no names (Clinton, Obama) used, but its purpose — and timing — are obvious. The Guardian called it “Michael Bay playing politico for the Fox News crowd.”

No surprise, then, that Trump has bought out a movie theater in Iowa and is giving away free tickets to those who RSVP. His aides have advertised that the Donald just wants everyone to know the truth about what happened in Benghazi (much like he wants his dear friend Ted Cruz to clear up that pesky little birther issue). I suspect this is not the kind of Merc retro reconsideration Hillary’s people​ appreciate.

The right considers Bernie a joke, so he hasn’t caught much Republican ire (yet). Our Fe quoted Gandhi last week with spot-on analysis of the situation: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” Yes, it’s true. ​It’s even possible. Bernie’s numbers are so close to Hil’s that he is now considered not just a contender but a threat.

Speaking of movies, his passionate intent to trust-bust has its companion piece in the Oscar-nominated film The Big Short, which is receiving rave reviews and is right on the money (or the disappearance of it, in this case). The challenges of inequity still turn on Wall Street corruption and elitism, the kind they don’t even attempt to hide.

Feeling the heat, Hillary has gone after Bernie on guns, having aligned herself with Obama’s call for tighter laws. Gabby Giffords endorsed her this week, and Hillary has telegraphed her intent to take on Sanders over his 2005 gun control stance in their final debate before the Iowa caucus.

Much as Trump has pulled his fellow candidates to the right, Bernie has pushed Hillary to the left, their differences looming large only in the eyes of progressives. Much as Mrs. Clinton ‘evolved’ on gay issues during her tenure as Secretary of State, she has evolved on guns this campaign, leaving behind, it seems, Obama’s quip in the 2008 campaign that a proudly armed Hillary was the equivalent of Annie Oakley. Another thing she won’t want anyone to review.

Hard to ​misinterpret, Mrs. Clinton is no longer the shoo-in the nation expected. It was supposed to be Clinton v. Bush not so long ago, not Trump vs. Sanders. We’re watching the ascent of the outliers​, which appears unstoppable. Establishment politics is being pushed to the side as American grievances have finally exploded into a frenzy of discontent, and the remaining establishment candidates are picking up the tab.

Memory of George W.’s spending habits, and flashes of that same half-baked and ill-deserved self-confidence, have soured brother Jeb’s chances, and perhaps it has finally sunk in on the left that every complaint over an Obama pick for some important post came with an asterisk that the person was a holdover from the Clinton administration.

While the establishment continues to endorse Clinton, judging her the ‘electable’ one, the progressive block — including The Nation magazine and MoveOn.org — endorsed Sanders this week. They’ve eschewed issues of personality in favor of policies that lift ​the average citizen. That comes as such a shock to most of the nation that they’re still scratching their heads, wondering what it means.

Now we’re all beginning to think the unthinkable. It might be Bernie, it might be Donald. (And although I agree, I was surprised to hear Bill Maher say it better not be Cruz because he’s “high intelligence in service to evil.” I doubt that I would use the world evil, though, and I’m surprised Bill did. Quite a statement for an infamous atheist).

Our exercise in ‘re-think’ arrived just in time to note that many Americans are entertaining interesting new possibilities, even willing to take a chance because to remain the same seems unthinkable. That seems to me a validation of Obama’s candid remarks on how gerrymander and financial corruption in politics can no longer be tolerated.

If — as Elizabeth Warren asserts — the game is fixed and we can’t find a way through, then we need to go up and over. Or maybe, given the roadblocks, just make a hard turn to the left, with one corresponding on the right. Then, in the manner of real populism, we’ll just let We, the People ​pick its poison.

Truth be told, if Trump takes the lead on the right, it won’t be a right turn — it will be whatever Trump finds most expedient to reflect his religion (money) and politics (money.) The choices are a return to building a movement toward restoration of democratic principles (because a Bernie presidency would get no farther than Obama’s did, given the congressional mix, but he would not — repeat NOT — be so gracious about where blame should fall) or one in which the republic makes no bones about becoming an authentic oligarchy, with the president the CEO of American corporate interests.

Make no mistake: either choice would put ‘truthiness’ out of business, but not without ripping the lid off to let all the worms out. Chris Weigant put the bones ​of such a race on the table for examination in a piece he called “Sanders Versus Trump, Revisited.” We are, indeed, revisiting so much, aren’t we? And it should provide just a tad of relief to note that with the advent of these candidates, the purity tests are out the window.

Bill O’Reilly says that if Bernie wins the election, he’ll move to Ireland (bonus!). I remember how many people were going to move away if Bush got another term, and some of them did. Tonight, Bill Maher returns from hiatus and asks his panel if a Bernie win is possible, what that would look like. It’s a question we’ll all be asking soon, I think, as we leave the absolutes of politics behind and begin to recreate them on the other side of the box. I’ll catch you up on Maher’s take in the comments.

Jupiter and Mercury are slowed, and so are we. Let’s keep reviewing, rethinking, minding hints of repeating pattern that come in waking and dream time. Take a breath now and then because there’s space in your day to do it, even a time-out if you think you need it. Remember, staying present is an art and it requires that we recall the past without losing ourselves, dream the future without flying away.

Confronting what has been considered impossible, unthinkable, and moving beyond it is an exercise in transformation. Unless we’re willing to do that, transformation remains mere potential. One of the reasons Ram Dass told us to ‘be here now’ was because it’s our only point of power, the moment in which we can make our choice — and our every choice defines reality for our own lives​, for that of the nation and the world, and a transformed future, waiting to bloom.

Meeting and Making

A little bit of action goes a long way. The nature of life and living changes when you act to meet circumstances and make something of them. Just as one example, there is a big difference between observing that we are “all one” and acting to prove you are “one with.”

len-wallick-logo

Proving yourself to be one with creation and equal to circumstance seems to show up in the astrology for this weekend. While it’s a proverbial team effort of celestial objects, there are some key players likely to manifest.

The Sun and Moon are nearly always where you want to look first. The Sun is predominant in so many ways. It’s the brightest object in the sky, the center of the solar system and a consistent point of reference.

The Moon, in turn, provides both a complement and counterpoint for the Sun. In combination, the Sun and Moon (often distinguished by astrologers as “the luminaries”) provide the template through which planetary aspects are most properly interpreted.

One of the more misunderstood aspects is a separation of 90 degrees on the zodiac (and in the sky, from Earthly perspective), called a “square.” Somewhere along the line, squares got an undeserved reputation as something to dread. Few things could be further from the truth (although it must be noted that some of those campaigning for President of the United States have ventured further from the truth than Pluto does from the Sun).

First off, squares (just like all astrological aspects) are simply stages in a cycle, a part of a continuous whole. That’s especially evident with squares from the Sun to the Moon. This weekend features one of those luminary squares commonly known as the first quarter Moon.

Above all, the lunar first quarter is both easy to see (weather permitting) and a lovely sight. When the Sun sets in the West, the first quarter Moon is already at its highest point in the sky, as one would expect from 90 degrees of separation. Hence, you don’t have to stay up late to see it. Additionally, because of its spatial orientation relative to the Sun and Earth, the lunar first quarter displays an appealing tableau that is half lit and half dark. How, one might logically wonder, can anybody make something negative out of that?

Perhaps the negative reputation for square aspects originates with what the lunar first quarter symbolizes at its most basic: a critical point in growth. It is the halfway point between an unseen New Moon and a fully grown Full Moon. Growth itself can indeed be stressful, hence the term “growing pains”. Yet without the phenomenon of growth, where would any of us be? Since it cannot be avoided as a stage in the cycle of life, why not meet and make something of it?

As if to emphasize the advantage in taking a little action (and its potential to go a long way), the lunar first quarter just after 6:26 pm EST (23:26:18 UTC) tomorrow takes place between the Sun in cardinal Capricorn and the Moon in cardinal Aries. Since solar ingress into any one of the cardinal signs (Aries, Cancer, Libra or Capricorn) corresponds to a new season, it would make even more sense to interpret tomorrow’s luminary square as a promising preliminary rather than as a menacing end.

Along with tomorrow’s first quarter Moon, we get at least one planetary aspect that seems to reinforce its life-affirming message: a trine (separation of 120 degrees) from Mars in fecund Scorpio to Neptune at home in its Pisces depths. Both planets are in signs that they rule, and therefore are powerfully expressed.

In addition, the trine aspect itself is rather powerful, connecting two planetary energies in conductive flow through signs that share a common symbolic element. In this case, the element in common between Scorpio and Pisces is water (Cancer is the third water sign). Your own experience tells you that nothing flows quite like water.

As a result, the growth motif of tomorrow’s lunar first quarter is emblematically enhanced by an aspect that represents all that makes life and growth possible in the first place. You have life-giving water connecting Mars (which, among other things, manifests in your life as desire) and Neptune (which, at its best, emerges in your life as sheer creativity). You don’t have to be Fellini to figure out that desire meeting creativity through a flow and exchange of fluid corresponds to sex — without which none of us would be here.

In sum, a plausible portrayal of the astrology this weekend represents not only life itself, but how it is most fundamentally met, made and continued in your practical everyday experience. To see something negative in that would be nothing less than condemning yourself, along with all that you love. To actively meet and make something of what your life presents this weekend would, on the other hand, affirm all that you are and all the world could be at its best. The choice is obvious, yet you still must act to make it true.

Offered In Service       

Danielle Voirin’s Photo of the Day for 01.15.16

VQ-A

The written readings for Vision Quest, Planet Waves’ 2016 annual edition, have now been published. Order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.


Paris-based photographer Danielle Voirin travels the world and documents her experiences in photographs. She takes street photography and photojournalism a shade beyond even art, to the level of mysticism. You may see more of her work on her website DanielleVoirin.com, or her alt website, DaniVoirin.com.

Prayer flags cascade throughout the intersection in front of the Carillon bar, which re-opened this week, on January 13th, two months after the November attacks in Paris.

Prayer flags cascade throughout the intersection in front of the Carillon bar, which re-opened this week, on January 13th, two months after the November attacks in Paris.

Danielle Voirin’s Photo of the Day for 01.14.16

VQ-A

The written readings for Vision Quest, Planet Waves’ 2016 annual edition, have now been published. Order all 12 signs at a great value or choose your individual signs.


Paris-based photographer Danielle Voirin travels the world and documents her experiences in photographs. She takes street photography and photojournalism a shade beyond even art, to the level of mysticism. You may see more of her work on her website DanielleVoirin.com, or her alt website, DaniVoirin.com.

Deep in the valleys of a yucca, where it looks as if it has bitten itself.

Deep in the valleys of a yucca, where it looks as if it has bitten itself.